"Ingathering of the exiles" refers to the vision of the biblical prophets, who said the Jews would return to the Promised Land of Israel after a long exile among the nations.
VOA: standard.2009.08.05
The Latter Prophets are poetic and oracular writings that bear the name of the prophet to whom the writings are ascribed.
后先知书则是诗歌型和神论似的著作,预言家被认为是完成这部作品的人。
It's a set of images that couldn't be more foreign or more alien to the prophetic mode of the Old Testament prophets.
这是一组不能再背离旧约先知的形象的,一组比喻了。
The Torah probably reached a fixed and authoritative status first, then the books of the Prophets and finally the Writings.
律法》可能是最早固定了权威地位的,然后是《先知书》再是《文集》
You can read Jeremiah and Isaiah and some of the great Old Testament prophets in some ways as defenders of slavery.
你可以读一读耶利米书和以赛亚书,在《旧约》中,还有些在某些方面,作为奴隶制拥护者的的伟大先知们的著作
Although this kind of talk about "armed prophets always win" is characteristic of Machiavelli, he likes this kind of tough talk.
虽然这种关于,“武装先知总是赢“的言论“,是马奇亚维利的特色,但他真的喜欢这种顽固的论调。
So the Jews today,what they call it is Tanakh, Ketuvim the Torah,the Law,the Prophets,and the Writings.
他们称之为塔纳赫,那三个词为Torah,Nevi’im和。
And the Former Prophets include the books of Joshua, Judges, 1 and 2 Samuel, 1 and 2 Kings. They read as a historical narrative.
前先知书》包括《约书亚书》《士师记》,《撒母尔书1-2》《列王记1-2》它们被当作史料。
You have the three major prophets, Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel, and then the twelve minor prophets, which in the Hebrew Bible get counted together as one book, because those twelve are very small.
先知书里有三大预言家,以塞亚,耶利米和以西结,后来还有12个小先知,他们因为很小所以,全部被收入了一卷。
It tells us of the critical junctures in the nation's history, and that will help us then slot the different prophets in.
告诉我们这个国家历史上的重大转型期,这就能帮我们锁定不同的预言家。
The first or former Prophets continues the kind of narrative prose account of the history of Israel, focusing on the activities of Israel's prophets.
前先知书延续了叙事性的风格,来讲述以色列历史,侧重于讲以色列关于预言的一些活动。
Now the Latter Prophets is a collection of books, each of which bears the name of the individual whose prophecies it purports to contain.
后先知书》是一些经书的合集,每一部都以一个人来命名,它们旨在讲述这些人的预言。
Who, in other words, ? is not present in Machiavelli's list of great prophets that one should imitate?
换句话说,谁未名列马奇亚维利的伟大先知名单,即那些该被仿效的伟人?
The section of the Prophets is divided really into two parts, because there are two types of writing in the prophetic section of the Bible.
先知书》里可以分成两部分,因为在先知书这篇中有两组不同风格的著作。
This material is therefore crucial background to reading the Latter Prophets.
这些材料提供了重要的背景知识,以使我们阅读《后先知书》
And it is here that Machiavelli introduces his famous distinction between armed and unarmed prophets.
也就在这个论点上,马奇亚维利推出他的著名区别定义,介于武装与非武先知之间。
These prophets delivered their oracles at critical junctures in Israel's history, in the nation's history, so their words are only going to make sense to us if we first understand the particular historical crises that they are addressing.
这些告知发表预言,总是在一些关键的转折期,在以色列历史中,国家的历史中,因此他们的话只对我们有意义,如果我们首先懂得某些特别的历史性危机,先知们所提到的。
Another theme that we see in these books or feature of the Deuteronomistic School is the emphasis on what we call the Yahwist prophets prophets like Elijah and Elisha.
我们在这些经书中看到另一个主题是,或者说是申命记学院派的特点是,强调耶和华的预言家,比如说先知以利亚和以利沙。
He clearly recognizes that there are clear exceptions to his rule about armed prophets.
他清楚地体认到,关于其武装先知标准的,例外情事。
The Former Prophets will concern us for the next few lectures.
我们在接下来的几次讲座中纠结《前先知书》
There are records of the messages of prophets.
还记录了一些先知传达的旨意。
So, the Former Prophets are narrative texts.
所以前先知书是叙事性文本。
All the armed prophets," he says, " "conquered and the unarmed were ruined."
他说:,“所有的武装先知都会战胜,而非武者终将被消灭“
It was probably produced there in the eighth century, and that is supported by the fact that Deuteronomy has affinities with the writings of some prophets we'll be looking at later from the Northern Kingdom of the eighth century, such as the prophet Hosea, and we'll see this when we look at Hosea's writings.
它也许是在八世纪产生的,这被,申命记与一些先知的作品的紧密联系,这个事实所支持我们稍后会从八世纪的北部王国,开始仔细的讲,例如何西阿先知,我们会在学习何西阿的作品时学习它。
The armed prophets conquer, the unarmed lose.
武装先知都会战胜而非武者终将灭绝。
Does he not say that armed prophets always win, the unarmed prophets lose? Did he not say that he wrote to reveal the effectual truth of things and ? not just what people have imagined the case to be?
难道他没说过武装的先知总能取胜而,徒手的先知总是失败?,难道他没说过,他写作是为了揭示出事物的本来面目,证明事物并非人们幻想的那个样子?
应用推荐