But the nymphs in all of their sensuous beauty, with "flow'r-inwov'n tresses," they have to experience the same fate.
但是年轻女神很美丽,但头发被扯断了“,她们不得不经历同样的命运。
The nymphs, of course, are powerless, and worse than that, the nymphs, as we know and of course as John Milton knew, are merely fictions. This is all made up.
海洋女神当然无能为力,更糟糕的是,海洋女神,我们都知道,弥尔顿也知道,只是虚构的,这都是虚构的。
The nymphs are departed," Eliot says.
仙女们已经离开“,艾略特写到。
Where were ye Nymphs, when the remorseless deep / clos'd o'er " the head of your lov'd Lycidas?"
诗歌大意:,“女神们,你们在哪里,当无情的海水漫过你们挚爱的利西达斯的头顶“
I think it's impossible not to wince when we imagine the painful tearing of the nymphs' tresses.
当我们想象那些年轻少女的长发被扯断的时候,我们会感到战栗不已。
Look at line fifty. This is where Milton asks the ocean nymphs where they were when Edward King's boat was lost ? while crossing the Irish Sea: why didn't you do anything?
看第50行,这里弥尔顿问海洋女神们,爱德华·金的船在穿越爱尔兰海途中失事的时候,她们在哪里:你们为什么不救他?
or nymphs and satyrs than you or I know and later urban poets - and Theocritus was an urban poet -later urban poets like Virgil or Milton knew even less than Theocritus, we have to assume.
的森林之神),忒奥克里托斯知道的不比你我或是后来的,都市诗人多--忒奥克里托斯就是个都市诗人,-后来的都市诗人像维吉尔和弥尔顿,我们得假定,对这些知道的就比忒奥克里托斯还少了。
Why after all should we expect the nymphs to have helped poor Lycidas?
我们凭什么希冀女神们会帮助可怜的利西达斯?
The conflictedness that Milton is encapsulating here is probably most intense in the last lines of this wonderful stanza: / "With flow'r-inwov'n tresses torn / the Nymphs in twilight shade of tangled thickets mourn."
弥尔顿在这想要化解的冲突,可能在这一段中最激烈:,少女的头发被扯断/,黄昏时在杂乱的灌木丛中哀叹“
应用推荐