Well, I think I know how Do you see what we've done We're gonna make such fools of ourselves How did we get here?

VOA: standard.other

So, we know ourselves that our behavior is due to a complicated cluster of the situation and our personal natures.

我们知道我们的行为是由于,一连串复杂的情况和我们的个人本性。

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

He takes it for granted that he is the most rational and systematic of all thinkers and raises questions about since we all take ourselves to be rational too raises questions about just how we know ourselves not to be paranoid delusives like Don Quixote.

他理所当然地认为,自己是所有思想者中最理性，最有条理的,他提出,既然我们也认为自己很理性,我们如何证明自己,不像堂吉诃德一样处于妄想之中呢？

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

"What we're going through in asking ourselves, 'Okay,we know what the goal is, is what we're going most likely to achieve that goal, is what a very decisive and intelligent commander-in-chief would do,".

VOA: standard.2009.10.06

And so sometimes we'll find ourselves thinking, "You know, there's an argument here that Socrates is putting forward.

所以有时候我们会这样想,看,这里有一个论证,是由苏格拉底提出的

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Philip Peters, Vice President of Lexington Institute, a private research orgnization based in Virginia, disagrees with members of Congress who assert that ending TV Marti broadcasts would strengthen the Castro regime in Cuba: "I don't know how we have gotten ourselves in the position where this particular instrument of public diplomacy is a test of everyone's manhood with regard to Communism in Cuba.

VOA: standard.2009.06.18

So there's nothing naturally going on unless we were to introduce it ourselves in our body that we know of, at least, that involves lithium.

因此，在正常情况下,什么都不会发生，除非我们有意识地摄入锂,起码在我们知道某些活动需要锂的情况下。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

I mean one way to describe this in a non-technical, non-Freudian way is, there are certain things about ourselves we'd rather not know.

用并不专业的非精神分析的话语来表述，就是我们并不想知道某些事情的存在。

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

As kids, as babies-- going back to the baby's scene, we give ourselves the permission to be human, we know that it's natural.

孩子和婴儿-,回到婴儿期，我们准许自己为人，我们知道那是自然的。

哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选

So if we start actually pushing ourselves to think about examples-- does it really take one to know one--the answer is, at least as a general claim, it's not true.

所以假如我们开始,深入探讨一些例子,到底需不需要同类才能互知 答案是,至少通常来说,这是不需要的

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Now, you know, when we've got our deterministic hats on, we think to ourselves, "There's got to be some underlying causal explanation, some feature about the break-down atoms that explains why they broke down and that was missing from the non-break-down atoms that explains why they don't break down.

现在,你知道,当我们用决定论的观点去分析这个问题时,我们自己寻思着,这背后一定有某种具有,因果关系的解释,某种关于分裂原子的特性,能解释为什么它们分裂了,而由于这种特性不存在于未分裂的原子,因而解释了它们为什么不能分裂

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选