For Gadamer the important thing is that the meaning be true, right, and that's where the distinction essentially lies.
对伽达默尔来说重要的是真实的意义,这就是二者的不同之处的核心。
The two passages that I'm about to read juxtapose the viewpoints that I've been trying to evoke in describing Gadamer's position.
我要读的这两篇文章在某些观点上是并行的,我在讲伽达默尔的看法时想激发的就是这些观点。
As I say, it's a wonderful irony that this particular difficulty in reading is precisely what Gadamer calls being pulled up short.
如我所说,这是个有趣的讽刺,这个阅读中特别的困难,正是葛达玛说的因某事“突然停住“
We can say that Iser's position is a reconstruction of what Gadamer has, essentially, to say about the merger of horizons.
我们可以说,伊瑟尔的观点,本质上是葛达玛观点的改写,比如说视域的融合。
Hirsch was engaged in lifelong disagreement with Gadamer but he was a student of Wimsatt, the author of "The Intentional Fallacy."
赫施一生都不同意葛达玛的观点,但他是温姆斯特的学生,温姆斯特是《意图谬论》的作者之一“
The great thing about classicism for Gadamer, or what he calls "tradition," is that it's something we can share.
对于伽达默尔来说古典主义,或者传统,最伟大之处是这是我们可以分享的。
I'll say again, somewhat in advance perhaps of the time I should say it, that Gadamer thinks that there's something immoral about historicism.
我会再讲一遍,现在说可能有点早,伽达默尔认为历史主义有些不道德。
In fact, Gadamer even insists that if we don't have this phenomenon of being pulled up short, our reading is basically just solipsistic.
事实上,葛达玛甚至坚持,如果我们没有这种“突然停下“的经历,我们的阅读基本上仅仅是以自我为中心的。
Gadamer believes that historicism forgets the possibility of being taught something by past-ness or otherness.
伽达默尔认为历史主义忘记了,我们会从过去性和他性中学到一些东西的可能性。
Gadamer's claim, however, was that if we do that, we are in fact suspending the way in which it might be that they speak true.
然而,葛达玛认为,如果我们那样做,我们很可能放弃了一个,可能告诉我们事实的方向。
He also plainly shares with Gadamer the assumption, the supposition, that the construal of meaning cannot be altogether objective.
他同时也坦率地表示自己和葛达玛,有一样的设想,那就是意思的解读并不都是客观的。
Whether Gadamer means that when he speaks of gap or whether he simply means an abyss or a distance to be crossed I couldn't say.
当葛达玛说到间隙时是那个意思,还是仅仅认为它是需要跨越的一个深渊或者一段距离,我不能确定。
You see, that's where the evaluative principle that completely revolutionizes Gadamer's canon comes in.
你瞧,这就是这个评价原则怎样使,使葛达玛的标准发生彻底改变的。
Gadamer says, and here again he's attacking historicism: The text that is understood historically is forced to abandon its claim that it is uttering something true.
伽达默尔在攻击历史相对主义时这样说道:,文本如果放在历史的角度理解,那么这样的理解肯定不是绝对正确的。
Now the first passage is in Gadamer's text on page 735, the very bottom of the page, and then I'll be going over to page 736.
现在我们要看的第一篇文章是伽达默尔写的,在第735页最下面,一直到736页。
But there may be ways of being pulled up short, occasions for being pulled up short, that Gadamer thinks exceed the imaginative grasp of a reader.
但葛达玛认为,有好几种“突然停下“的方法和场合,会超乎读者的想象,理解不了。
And we bring that prejudice to bear on our interpretation of the line, then that is a constructive way into the circle according to Heidegger and Gadamer.
我们把我们的先见带入了我们对诗句的解读,按照海格德尔和伽达默尔的意思就是,良性的循环。
As you'll see when we return to Iser after I've said a few things about Hirsch, this, as you'll see, is the fundamental difference between Gadamer and Iser.
正如你们所看到的,当我谈论了赫施的问题之后,又回到了伊瑟尔,这就是葛达玛和伊瑟尔的明显不同。
What Gadamer does in his essay is actually an act of intellectual conservatism, it has to be admitted.
伽达默尔在他文章里说的,是思想保守主义的一种表现,这点必需得承认。
So understand that hermeneutics isn't necessarily about, as Gadamer would put it, merging historical horizons.
所以,解释学不完全是,正如伽达默尔所说,历史观的碰撞。
Obviously, Gadamer refuses to argue that we can distinguish in that way reliably.
显然,葛达玛并未争论我们是否能,正确地区分这两者。
If you are expressing an opinion, in other words, which differs radically from my own, I can't understand, according to Gadamer, whether or not you're being ironic.
换句话说,如果你在表达一个,与我所持观点彻底相反的观点时,葛达玛认为我并不能理解你是不是在讽刺。
Our primary text will be the excerpt in your book from Hans-Georg Gadamer and a few passages that I'll be handing out from Martin Heidegger and E.D. Hirsch.
主要内容就在大家手上课本里,汉斯·格奥尔格·加达默尔的节选以及,我将带给大家的马丁·海德格尔和赫希的一些文章。
listen to Gadamer's version of how the circularity of this thinking works.
看一看伽达默尔眼中,思维的循环是如何进行的。
Now if this is the case, it seems to me that one has found a loophole in Gadamer's conservatism about what the reader can do.
如果是这样的话,我认为大家在葛达玛对,读者理解能力的保守主义论中,能找到一个漏洞。
That's Gadamer's position, and it is the position of anyone who opposes that of Hirsch, although what he means by the distinction is clear enough.
那是葛达玛的观点,也是所有赫施反对者的观点,虽然他对区别的定义已经够明显了。
In the meantime, Gadamer is objecting to this because he says, you simply can't do this.
同时,伽达默尔反对历史主义因为他说,人们做不到。
Implicit, according to Gadamer, in the notion of objectivity is an abandonment of the possibility of learning from the object, of learning from otherness.
伽达默尔认为,客观性这个概念中隐含着,放弃了从对象中学习,从相异性中学习的可能。
Gadamer is willing to sacrifice because of his belief in the inescapability of preconception.
伽达默尔愿意牺牲,因为他相信先入之见不可避免。
应用推荐