-
The Crito, on the other hand, is a conversation between Socrates and a single individual, only one person.
另一方面来说，《克里托篇》则是一场,介于苏格拉底与单一个体之间的对话，就只有一人。
-
The Apology and the Crito represent a tension, they represent even a conflict between two more or less permanent and irreconcilable moral codes.
苏格拉底自辩篇》和《克里托篇》,代表着一种张力，它们甚至可说代表着两种,多少算是永恒,且无法调和的道德规范。
-
The Apology, the Crito, these are warm-ups to the big theme, to the big book, the Republic.
苏格拉底自辩篇》，《克里托篇》,都是更大主题的，暖身读物。
-
If the Apology presents the philosopher's case against the city, Socrates' case against the city, the Crito presents the city's case against the philosopher.
如果《自辩篇》,呈现哲学家对抗城邦的论点，苏格拉底对抗城邦的论点，《克里托篇》则呈现,城邦对付哲学家的论点。
-
Crito is named for a friend and disciple of Socrates who at the outset of the dialogue is sitting as a watchful guardian over his mentor.
克里托篇》的命名源自,苏格拉底的一名朋友及信徒,在对话之初,就诚心守护着他的这位良师益友。
-
Crito is, of course, very concerned with what people will think of him if it becomes known that he has somehow not helped Socrates to escape.
克里托当然，很关心人们对他的观感,如果被知道,他无能帮助苏格拉底越狱。
-
In many ways, the Crito, in some respect, is the platonic dialogue about piety.
在很多角度看来《克里托篇》于某些方面，是柏拉图式的敬神对话。
-
The Apology takes place in the Court of Athens, the most public of settings, while the Crito occurs within the darkness and confinement of a prison cell.
苏格拉底自辩篇》发生在雅典的法庭，最公开的场合；,而《克里托篇》则是在,阴暗幽禁的监狱牢房之中。
-
That's the question I want us to consider again for next week as we finish the Apology ?! and move our way up to the Crito. Okay?
这是我希望大家在下周,结束《苏格拉底自辩篇》之前思考的问题,然后我们将进入《克里托篇》，好吗？
-
This is the question raised by this dialogue in the Crito as well.
这个问题也,出现在《克里托篇》的对话中。
-
So let's look into the Crito just a little bit.
我们来研究一下《克里托篇》
-
The question is, why does Socrates exhibit such proud defiance and independence of the laws in the Apology, and such total, even kind of mouse-like, acquiescence to the laws in the Crito?
问题是，为何苏格拉底一方面展现了自豪的反抗,及独立于法律之外如同《自辩篇》所载，但这种绝对性，却化为鼠辈般，默认了全部的法律，一如《克里托篇》所载？
-
Is that speech for the law, with the laws, really intended for the benefit of Crito, rather than an expression ? of Socrates' deepest opinions about the questions of obligation and obedience?
那场为法律所讲，有关法律的对话，真的是要为克里托排解，而不是苏格拉底,最深层意见的表述,尤其是那些问题攸关义务与服从？
-
Aristophanes' play sometimes is even included in certain editions of the book you're reading like this one it has the edition of Aristophanes' Clouds in it along with the Apology and Crito.
亚里斯多芬尼斯的剧作有时,也会包含在,你们所读的特定版本书中，像这本,它内含亚里斯多芬尼斯的《云》,还有《苏格拉底自辩篇》和《克里托篇》
-
Maybe the answer, or an answer, to this question is revealed in the Crito, the companion dialogue, the companion speech that goes along with the Apology, although it typically gets much less attention than the Apology.
也许答案或任何一种响应，这个问题的答案都可在《克里托篇》寻得，这是柏拉图的另一篇语录，另一篇,与《苏格拉底自辩篇》等齐的辩论，但一般较少受到,与《苏格拉底自辩篇》等同的注意。
-
But it gets back to the question, are the reasons Socrates gives Crito for refusing to escape, the reasons he puts in the mouth of the laws of the city of Athens, ? are those Socrates' true reasons?
但这带回到那个问题，到底苏格拉底给克里托,拒绝越狱的理由，他以雅典城邦法律立场,所说的理由，是苏格拉底真正的理由吗？
-
Plato's dialogues, the Apology as well as the Republic and the Crito are in the broadest sense of the term, an attempt not only to answer the charge against Aristophanes but also defend the cause of philosophy as something of value and merit.
柏拉图的语录《苏格拉底自辩篇》,《理想国》和《克里托篇》,以最广泛的解释看来，不仅试图响应,亚里斯多芬尼斯的控诉,同时还捍卫着,哲学的目标是价值与功绩。
-
In the first speech of the Apology, he defies the city to put him to death by expressing indifference to death and then in the Crito, he very much expresses that indifference to death by refusing to allow Crito to let him escape.
苏格拉底自辩篇》的第一场申辩中，他抗拒城邦处他死刑,理由是他根本漠视死亡,但之后在《克里托篇》,他表述漠视死亡的方式,变成拒绝让克里托助他逃亡。
-
Socrates seems to remain, even until the end, very much a kind of law unto himself while at the same time, again, providing Crito and others like him an example of rational and dignified obedience to the law.
苏格拉底一直到最后，似乎都保持着一种自我定义的法律,但同时，却也提供克里托及其它同类,一种理信,与庄严的服从法律范例。
应用推荐