And it is not for me to set myself up as the one person able to answer it.

VOA: special.2009.04.18

And part of the reason for putting it up is that I want to, as much as possible, answer that question by separating out the mechanism, which is the computer from computational thinking. Right.

提出这个问题的原因有一部分在于,我想尽量，将计算机与,计算思维分开,来回答它。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

So it's not, as I say altogether straightforward to see how the answer " "Death is bad for me, because when I'm dead I don't exist" how that answers the problem as opposed to simply focusing our attention on the problem ? How can nonexistence be bad for me?

所以这并不是，就像我说的,那么简单可以领会到这个答案,“死亡对我来说不好，因为我死了我就不存在了“,如何回答了这个问题,和我们仅仅把关注点放在问题本身相反,不存在怎么可能对我来说有坏处呢？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

I know this is the right answer, because if I now find the acceleration, I find it's mg divided by m and I get -g as the answer for all bodies.

我知道这个等式是正确的,因为现在如果我要求物体的加速度,用 mg 除以 m,我就得到 -g,这个结果对所有物体都成立

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选