And the rejection of this motif or this idea in Genesis 1 is pointed and purposeful. It's demythologization.
但《创世纪》第一章中对此模式或观点的否定,是明显且有目的的,它是一种去传奇化的叙述。
It's pointed and purposeful.
它是目的明确的。
You say, "Whoa, what is this?" Kant makes a distinction between the purposive and the purposeful. What is the distinction?
我咧个去,这货说的是啥?,其实康德将,“合目的性“和“目的性“做了比较,什么比较呢?
I want it or I disapprove of it and, lo and behold, it's no longer aesthetic. I'll come back to that in a moment, but I hope you can see that that is a distinction between the purposive and the purposeful.
我会产生想法,比如想得到它还是觉得它恶心,你瞧,这样一来就不只是纯审美问题了,我一会儿再回来讲,但是我希望你们现在可以区分,“合目的性“和“目的性“这两个概念了,它们是有区别的。
So that's Kant's famous distinction between the purposive, which is the organization of an aesthetic object, and the purposeful, which is the organization of any object insofar as it goes to work in the world or for us.
所以康德的著名理论,关于区分美学意义上的“合目的性“,和存在意义上,服务于我们的“目的性“
应用推荐