• So,composition alone can't give you the answer to the question why is the plywood superior to the solid pine board?

    只用组成成分无法解答,这个问题,为什么胶合板要优于松木板呢?

    麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

  • And the first thing you do is ask is it an instance of some problem that other people have already solved?

    而且你以前从没碰过这个问题,你首先要做的一件事就是问问自己,这是不是一个别人已经解决了的问题

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • I wonder have any of you reflected on, I don't want to call it shadow side, is not domesticated.

    不知道你们有没有人想过这个问题,我不想说这是自然的阴暗面,无法驯化的一面。

    普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

  • It was a thorough examination of that problematic leading to the conclusion that that's what the myth was about.

    他的解读是对这个问题的彻底考察,最终得出这个神话是关于什么。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • OK, important -- if you are part of this group here think about it and make sure you understand that.

    好的,这很重要,如果刚才你选了可逆过程,请好好想想并且保证已经理解了这个问题

    麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

  • And I want to get at that question of embarrassment, because it comes up very explicitly on page 36.

    我还想讲一下刚才那个关于难堪的问题,因为在第36页明确提出了这个问题

    耶鲁公开课 - 1945年后的美国小说课程节选

  • So we've now whittled this problem down into half and so we can literally and dramatically throw half of the problem away.

    如此一来,我们就把这个问题简化了一半,我们可以大胆的扔掉另一半。

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • So let's address this by considering another example, which should clarify what the difference is between these ionization energies.

    让我们用另外一个例子来讲一讲这个问题,这应该能够说清楚,各个电离能之间的区别。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • Another way into this problem: let's look at the comments that Dr. Johnson made about Milton's Lycidas in the eighteenth century.

    这个问题的另一个角度:让我们看看,约翰逊博士在18世纪队弥尔顿的《利西达斯》所做的评论。

    耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

  • Because, when you ask yourself that question, you should consider what is the thermal energy versus the bonding energy?

    这是因为,对于这个问题,我们应当考虑到,什么样的热能,对应于键能?

    麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

  • Nobody knows, but there's a theory which won't answer your question but will put it into a broader context.

    没有人知道答案,但有这么个理论,它无法回答你的问题,但却能让你从更宽广的视角来看这个问题

    耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

  • Now in thinking about this question thinking about this question it's important not to misunderstand what we were asking.

    思考这个问题的时候,在思考这个问题,重要的是不要误解,我们问的问题

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • In large part because our government has confused us about it, but it's a confusing question to know.

    虽说很大程度上,是政府把这个问题变得复杂,但这个问题本身确实值得商榷

    耶鲁公开课 - 生物医学工程探索课程节选

  • The debate over that question is fierce, and it's one we're going to leave for another day.

    对于这一问题的讨论相当激烈,我们将留下这个问题以后讨论。

    耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

  • Because I thought about it a lot Welles chose that word I guess obviously that frame was a happy picture ? In the word? Why that word?

    因为我对这个问题想了很多,为什么威尔斯要选择这个词,我觉得很明显,这个镜头是幸福的,词内涵的深意?还是为什么选这个词?

    麻省理工公开课 - 电影哲学课程节选

  • It's not as equitably distributed as one would like it to be distributed.

    因为分配不均的问题,这个问题从来就没有顺过民意。

    普林斯顿公开课 - 国际座谈会课程节选

  • That's a little bit of a tricky question but-- So, do the best you can on it and think-- try to think about what this kind of theory would imply for gambling behavior.

    这个问题有些难度,但是...,尽力思考这个问题,思考下这一理论,该如何应用到赌博行为上去

    耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

  • To begin to answer this question you might say even begin to think about it in the right way requires that we stand back from Aristotle's text for a while and ask some fundamental questions about it.

    若要开始回答这个问题,你也甚至可以说,开始以正确的方式思考这个问题,需要我们,暂时放下亚里士多德的大作,回头提问一些基本的问题

    耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

  • Again, we have to ask ourselves, we have to start thinking of the question about what does this mean for doing something about changing the world's diet, changing the nation's diet, changing the world's diet?

    让我们来问问自己,考虑一下这个问题,改变一个国家的饮食文化,改变这个世界的饮食,这意味着什么

    耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选

  • And when you have an optimal substructure and the local solutions overlap, that's when you can bring dynamic programming to bear.

    当你得到一个最优子结构,但局部解决方案有重跌时,你就可以引入动态编程,来解决这个问题了。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • So that can be unsettling when we think of this as happening at a certain contemporaneous moment in the history of thought.

    如果把这个问题放在思想史的特定时期来想,它可能是难以解决的。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • Adiabatic can be either reversible or not, and we're going to do that probably next time or two times.

    绝热过程可以是可逆的,也可以不是,我们可能会在下一次或下下次课上,研究这个问题

    麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

  • Well, I think it's characterized at least in part by what Descartes goes on to say in his Meditations.

    我认为在《沉思录》接下来的篇章中,笛卡尔至少部分提到了这个问题

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • Long before Milton had begun to tackle the problem, Christians had for centuries, for millennia, puzzled over the logical inconsistency between these two concepts.

    早在弥尔顿应对这个问题之前,基督教徒们就已经花了成百上千年,为这两个概念之间逻辑上的前后矛盾感到困惑。

    耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

  • Well, this is a problem that we have solved and will solve in the weeks to come. See you Monday.

    嗯,这是我们解决了的一个问题,并且将在接下来几周来解决这个问题,下周一再见。

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • But you can also look at it qualitatively, so, if you think about the force between the electron and the proton, you could just qualitatively think about what's happening.

    但你也可以定性的来研究这个问题,所以如果你们考虑电子,和质子之间的作用力,你可以定性的来想。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • It's a good question. The question is, "What are the chances that somebody with autism will be able to overcome their deficiencies?"

    不错的问题,这个问题是,"孤独症患者,能够克服自身缺陷的几率会有多大"

    耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

  • So no harm is done, once we've clarified the question that we're trying to ask, if we summarize that question in a bit of a jargon or slogan.

    其实没什么的,一但我们证实了我们,试图想要解决的问题,如果把这个问题用术语或行话简化

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • I'm going to define a class, and in particular, what I'm going to do, is walk through what that says.

    我们碰到了一个问题这个问题就是,我们想要建立,一个抽象数据类型。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • So I'm going to solve this by enumerate and check, which is an example of what's called a brute-force algorithm.

    你懂的,所以我得靠列举和检验来解决这个问题,这就是我们说的穷举算法。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定