For those people who say "Yeah, van Inwagen was right about the tower and the same thing will be true about the watch."

还有些人认为,范·，因瓦根说的没错,手表那个例子中,他说的没错“

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

And that's not very English and I think that's why he is a bit more shocking, not on English television,

那不是很有英国范儿，我想这就是为什么他有一些骇人的，不是在英国电视上，

认识戈登•拉姆齐吗？ - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

When I think about the tower case, I do find myself inclined to say with "van Inwagen, that's not the tower my son built."

当我想到塔积木塔这个案例时，我确实发现自己,赞同范·，因瓦根的观点，那座塔不是我儿子原先搭的那个“

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

That's what van Inwagen would say, if that's the way body resurrection would work.

范·，因瓦根认为，肉体复活就是这个道理。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

This is an example that is due to Peter van Inwagen.

这个例子,是彼得·范·，因瓦根提出的。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So van Inwagen concludes, if you have an object, and you take it apart, and then put them all back together again, you don't have the very same object that you started out with.

所以范·，因瓦根总结道，如果你将拥有的物体拆开，再把所有的零件重组，你手上的并非,原来的那个物体。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

That's what van Inwagen says.

这是范·，因瓦根的观点。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选