Back to our hypothetical, you know, our initial discussion of Flaming Hot Cheetos: by his definition that would not qualify as food.

再回过头来谈谈我们之前的假定,我们曾讨论过关于火焰辣奇多的问题,按照他的定义,奇多不能算作食物

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选

so I guess that would count as the same day.

我想应该算作同一天吧。

耶鲁的忙碌生活 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

I'm glad to hear that no one counted this r equal zero as a node.

我很高兴没听到有人把ｒ等于０这处也算作是一个节点。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

It obviously applies in Economics, but it also applies in politics, and in fact, this class will count as a Political Science class if you're a Political Science major.

显然适用于经济学,但也适用于政治学,实际上,对政治专业的同学来说,它也算作政治课

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Why isn't this a solution?

为什么还不能算作一种解决方案呢

耶鲁公开课 - 生物医学工程探索课程节选

There are other things that would qualify as food, but the not too much of course has to do with over-- intake of certain nutrients, the calories; and then eating mostly plants tends to be a pretty good idea.

辣奇多绝对不能算作食物,至于"适量饮食"则应参考,某些营养素及热量的摄入量,而"植物为主"是一条非常好的建议

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选