But, in economic terms, there's no difference between losing the tickets and losing $400, so why do you behave differently?

但是，从经济学角度上看,丢了票和丢了400美元没有什么不同，但你为何会做出不同的反应呢？

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

This is a world understood from a metonymic point of view as that which lacks organicity, and yet at the same time the whole point of the story is thematically metaphoric.

这个世界要从转喻的角度来理解,因为世界没有组织性，而且同时,整个故事的主旨就是比喻性的。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

So this squared at the origin is going to be a very high probability, and it decays off as you get farther and farther away from the nucleus or from the center, and that's independent of the angle.

所以这个平方,在原点处非常高，随着离核子的距离,越来越远,它逐渐衰减，并且它和角度是没有关系的。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

But there's nothing mysterious about death from the physicalist point of view, at least about the basic idea of what's going on in death.

但是死亡没有什么神秘可言,从物理主义的角度来看,至少死亡的基本定义是不神秘的

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

From this perspective, dreams serve no adaptive function at all but rather they're epiphenomena.

从这个角度看，梦境没有自我适应功能,它只是一种副现象。

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

So those of you who haven't, don't worry, I mean this will be a bit review, but we'll see it more through the eyes of Game Theory this time, and for those of you who haven't, don't worry we're going to go through it.

如果你没学过,也不必担心,我们一起来快速回顾一下吧,但这次我们用博弈论的角度去分析,那些之前没有学过的同学,别担心,现在我们一起来看一遍

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

There's no classical way to think about what a wave function is.

我们没有办法从经典力学的角度,想象波函数是什么样的，没有经典的类比。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

When we look at this angular part, we see that it's always the square root of 1 over 4 pi, it doesn't matter what the angle is, it's not dependent on the angle.

当我们看这角向部分，可以看到它总是等于１除以４pai开根号，这和是什么角度没有关系，它和角度无关。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

First of all, Empson doesn't really kind of settle into - a sense that it's all about the reader-- that is to say, that it's all about the reader's experience of the literary.

首先，Empson并没有真正,从读者角度考虑问题-,也就是说,没有从读者的文学经历上考虑。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Well,no clear reason to say-- for the personality theory to say-- that he's Shelly Kagan and I'm not.

从人格理论的角度来看-,没有明确的理由说-,他就是Shelly，Kagan而我不是。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

B In fact, it's even a question whether A is A, but it's certainly not B, right? This much we know. In the grammatical sense there is no sort of mystification about the metaphor.

实际上，人们甚至对A是不是A都有疑问，但肯定不是，是吧，我们都知道这点，而从语法的角度来看,并没有像暗喻一样的神秘化。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选