So inadvertent sins can be purged, the sanctuary defilement that they cause can be purged by bringing a purification sacrifice.
无意的罪孽可以被净化,给圣所所带来的玷污,可以通过进行净化祭来净化。
What place can it occupy in each type of discourse, what functions can it assume, and by obeying what rules?"
它可以在每种话语中占据什么样的位置,它在遵循什么原则的情况下可以有什么样的功能?“
He would gladly have traded dozens -he would have traded dozens of corrupt Anglican ministers for the simple and honest King.
他可以欣然的,他可以出卖大量的圣公会牧师的头衔,并从中牟利,只是为了一个诚实简单的国王。
Our bulletin boards of sorts, discussion forums, where you can not only browse discussions, questions that your classmates have asked, you can certainly ask questions of your own.
在我们的电子公告牌,论坛,你们不仅可以浏览其他人的讨论,你的同学们所问的问题,你们当然也可以问你们自己的问题。
I think it can because to me, it seems that it's very similar to the process of electing representatives for legislature.
我认为是可以的,因为对我来说这非常类似于,选举立法代表的过程。
Thing I've got a little procedure that could do that, but you know the simplest thing I could do is to say well, gee, wait a minute, why don't I just check to see if these are the same thing?
这两个点是同一个点么?,我已经写了一小块代码,可以提供这个功能,但是你知道的我可以做的,最简单的事情就是说好,嗯?,等等,我为什么不直接去看看,这两个东西相等不相等呢?
Death is bad insofar as it deprives you of a chunk of life that would have been good.
死亡是坏的,因为它剥夺了,你的本可以美好的生命。
Hardy wants to use really old dialect words, when he can, and there's power in that. And this is a poem composed in 1915.
哈迪在他可以的时候总是想使用真正的古代方言,而在其中是有力量的,这是一首在1915年作的诗。
We can do it reversibly, or we can do it irreversibly.
它可以是可逆的,也可以是不可逆的。
But essentially the only reason there was any way that that was an effective approach was because people basically realize "Oh this is a good idea and we agree with that as a culture."
但是,归根结底,这种方式之所以,能够取得成功,是因为,人们意识到,“哦,这挺好的,我们的文化可以接受它“,“哦,这挺好的,我们的文化可以接受它“
Somebody with apraxia can move, do simple movements just fine but they can't coordinate their movements.
失用症患者是可以行动的,可以做简单的动作,但是他们无法协调他们的动作
Specifically you'll see that the rationale for observing the Sabbath is different. God's name in Deuteronomy 5 is not to be used in a vain oath as opposed to a false oath. There are differences in the meaning.
你会发现两者对守安息日习俗的论述是特别不同的,《申命记》第五章的描述是,不可以妄称上帝的名,而不是不可以以上帝的名义作假誓,它们表达的意思。
It's okay. They can march.
没问题,他们可以的踏步了
But also, there is this sense of imagination, and you get that in the dreaming waters; you get that in the sense of travel or the image of the road that you can see in the green and red vegetables stretching away in their rows to the bright horizon.
但其中也有想象,从“如梦如幻的河水“你可以感受到;,从旅行的感觉或路的形象可以看到,从“一排排红的绿的蔬菜,在阳光下延伸得又直又长直到闪耀的地平线上“,可以看到。
And what this is, is that if you want to take the section in French, you should have about an equivalent of 130, and the discussion's in French and a couple of the books-- I'll talk about them in a minute-- you can read in French, the others you read in English.
这个就是说,你要是想用法语授课,你的法语得有130分左右的水平,课堂讨论是用法语还有一些书,我马上要说到那些书 你可以看法语版的,其他人可以看英语版的
And the other thing you can do is take self reports like the ones you're doing, hopefully do enough of them, and a random enough sample of the population, that you can extrapolate from that sample to the whole population, and try to estimate what people are eating in that way.
还有其他可以做的,比如大家正在做的这种个体调查,希望能把它做的充分些,如果有充足的随机样本,就可以从样本推断出,整个总体,从而推断哪类人有这样的饮食习惯
Peter wields the keys of the kingdom of heaven and can open and shut the doors of personal salvation, just as he can open and shut the doors of the church.
彼得挥舞着通往天堂极乐的钥匙,他可以任意打开关闭,凡人可借此得救的大门,正如他可以任意操控通往教会的大门一样。
Derrida never really claims that you can do without it.
德里达从来没有说过,不这样做是可以的。
Some people said, "Well, if they had consented to a lottery, it would be different. Then it would be all right."
有人说,如果他们同意采取抽签方式,那就不一样了,那样就是可以的“
So if you guys could come over here but still maintain your alignment so 128 should be all the way over here and one, you should be all the way over here and you guys similarly need to shuffle.
你们可以过来,但要保持队形,你可以走过来,后面的人也可以跟着慢慢的移动。
I don't have to go read what it printed out in the screen. This has returned a value that I can use. Because I could do a test to say, is this a return value? If it's not, I'll do something else with it. So the binding is still there, it simply doesn't print it out.
我不想读到屏幕中打印出来的这行字,程序返回过一个我能够使用的值,因为我可以做个小测试,来说明这是否是返回的值,如果不是,我可以做一些其它的事,而这个绑定依然在这儿,没有打印任何东西。
- And so you can begin to express -- -- even though the language is a bit arcane -- your ideas in the same way that you might actually speak them.
所以你可以开始表达-,即使那个语言有点晦涩-,你的想法可以用同样的方式说出来。
The second law says that really, you can't do that.
这是不可以的,唯一可以实现的方法就是。
The second question I want to ask is what's the base case? When do I get down to a problem that's small enough that it's basically trivial to solve? Here it was lists of size one. I could have stopped at lists of size two right. That's an easy comparison.
第二个问题是什么是基础条件?,我要将问题分解到何时才使得问题,小到可以解决的基本问题?,这里是当列表的长度为1有时候,我也可以在长度为2的时候停止分解,那是一个非常简单的对比。
It's defined later down which is fine.
等下再定义这个函数,那也是可以的。
and so I trust that it's easily intelligible as I read it to you now.] In fact, however, we have given up the claim to find, in the past, any truth valid and intelligible for ourselves.
所以我相信现在我读的时候大家一定会更容易理解],事实上,我们已经放弃了从过去中寻找,对于自己来说靠得住的,可以理解的事实。
Because even if the soul is invisible, 5 if, nonetheless, contrary to what Socrates was claiming, invisible things can be destroyed, then maybe the invisible soul can be destroyed as well.
因为即使灵魂是无形的5,像第五点所说的那样,但是和苏格拉底的观点相反的是,无形的东西可以毁灭,那无形的灵魂,也许同样可以毁灭。
And my guess is the result is yes, you could but you're not going to feel un-conflicted about it and it's because these two are conflicting each other at the same time.
我的观点是,你可以爱上两个以上的人,你可以这样做,但是你会内心很矛盾,因为这两者,一直思想一直不停地在做斗争。
Changing the diet of populations is a pretty good idea and it's the kind of thing that could help individuals certainly lead healthier, happier lives, but also could change things like healthcare costs for a whole country, so these are big, big factors.
改变大众的饮食是个很好的想法,它不仅可以让人们过上更健康幸福的生活,还可以改变整个国家的医保费用,所以饮食是个非常非常重要的因素
应用推荐