These are unquestionably strong words, and I think it's impossible for us to overestimate the weight of these words.
毫无疑问,这些言辞非常激烈,我觉得,怎么高估它们的分量都不过分。
If you want your voice to be louder,
如果你想要你的言论更有分量,
OK, notice we have two inexact differentials and exact differentials. This is a condition.
好,注意到这里面有两个不准确微分量,和一个准确微分量,这是结论。
This is a normal weight laboratory rat given much more than it would-- could necessarily eat of standard laboratory food.
这是一只体重正常的实验鼠,如果我们给它标准的实验室饲料,即使食物分量超出了它的食量
You can imagine that if a vector is viewed from an angle, then its components will vary with the perspective.
你可以想象一下,如果换一个角度观察矢量,其分量会相应地发生变化
The very presence in a theatrical piece of a long and weighty philosophical debate like this one could easily be seen as having a pretty tedious effect.
很容易看出这样一个戏剧般长篇,而有分量的哲学争论,有着令人厌倦的作用。
And probably back home there would be the implication that if you can't work things out among them with consensus, probably the king has some weight.
当在本国的领土时,如果对最终的决定存在着很大的争议,国王的意见有很大的分量
But since it is a component it can have a direction, too, so can go up l between negative l and positive l.
但因为它是个分量,它是有方向的,所以它可以,从负的l一直到正的。
So the components of the vector are not invariant characterizations of the vector.
矢量的两个分量,并不是一成不变的
Small portions are bad, that's right. Yes?
小分量食物是不好的,也对,还有吗
If I just come and say to you, "Here's the vector whose components are 3 and 5.
假如我问你们,"一个矢量的分量分别是 3 和 5
Everything has to completely match.
所有分量必须完全相同
Small portions are bad.
小分量食物是不好的
How do the components of A in the new rotated coordinate system relate to the components of the old coordinate system?
在旋转后的新坐标系中 A 的分量,和原始坐标系中 A 的分量有什么关联呢
This vector i prime has got a horizontal part, This kind of trigonometry you should know all the time.
矢量 i' 有一个水平方向的分量,这类三角关系你们应该已经很熟悉了
So since it's a component of the angular momentum, that means that it's never going to be able to go higher than l is, so it makes sense that, for example, it could start at and then l go all the way up to l.
因为,它是,角动量的分量,这意味着,它不会,比l大,这是很容易理解的,比如说,它可以从零开始,一直到。
I've told you, if two vectors are equal, the components must match.
我说过如果两个矢量相等,那它们的分量必须都相同
The components come in the minute you pick your axis.
但它的分量由你所选择的坐标系确定
If two arrows are equal, you cannot be longer in the x direction and correspondingly short in the y direction.
如果要使两个矢量相等,那么即使 x 分量长一些,y 分量相应地小一些也是不行的
If you do, the unit vectors are called i prime and j prime, the components of the vector change.
如果这么做,单位矢量就是 i' 和 j',矢量的两个分量也会发生变化
You cannot have two vectors equal without exactly the same x component, exactly the same y component.
你不能说两个矢量相等,如果它们的 x 分量不完全相同,或者 y 分量不完全相同
Once you do that, I think it's fairly clear that it has got a y component that's given by cosine the x component is negative.
用了这个结论,我想很明显,y 分量由 cos φ 给出,它的 x 分量是负的
They come from writing i prime and j prime in terms of i and j, then sticking it in an expression and identifying the new representation.
写出用 i 和 j 来表示 i' 和 j' 的式子,再代入分量的表达式,就能得到新的式子
And I can find the orientation of the arrow You have the option of either working with the two components of A or with the arrow.
我也可以求得矢量的方向,你可以选择使用,A 的两个分量或者矢量图来计算
For the x part, I'm going to write x = x0 + v0 t.
对于 x 分量,有 x = x0 + v0 ? t.
It's got components which are x and y that could vary with time.
它有两个分量,x 和 y,二者都随时间变化
If you say, "Add the vectors, " I would just add the x to the x and the y to the y and I'm keeping track of what the sum is.
如果你们说 " 将矢量相加 ",我就把同为 x 轴方向的分量相加,同为 y 轴方向的分量相加,然后就能得出这两个矢量的和是多少了
The x parts match and the y parts match.
分量要相同,y 分量也要相同
Try to be as accurate as you can about how much of something you eat.
最好尽可能精确地记下你吃的分量
The components of the vector are not the same.
矢量的分量和原来的也不再相同
应用推荐