Not on the basis of simple filling in ascending order, but a modified rate of filling as according to the Aufbau Principle.
并不是以简单的升值分布为基础,而是一个修改的填充方法,根据构造原理得到的填充法。
So we need to revise our account of what it is on the physicalist picture to say that you're dead.
我们应该重新修改一下,物理主义学上对死亡的定义。
We'll talk more about this later, but it often happens that when you change your program to solve one problem you break it, and things that used to work don't work.
我们以后会更多的去讨论者一点,但是经常发生的情况是当你因为,一个问题修改你的程序的时候,你修改了程序,但原来没问题的模块。
So, for starters we'll keep that as our zero energy, we're going to change it soon to make something that makes more sense in terms of bonding, but we'll keep that as zero for now.
因此,首先我们将会保持零点能的这个定义,但很快我们就会对它进行修改,使它在讨论成键时更合理,但是目前我们还是暂时采用这种定义。
So I hit control X. It's very unnecessarily arcanely saying save modified buffer, and then answering no will destroy changes.
敲入控制键X,它会很罗嗦地,问你是否保存所做的修改,如果回答为NO,就不保存修改过的部分。
So he but he moves to question ? should law be changed? Is law changeable?
是的,但他还是质问,法律应被修改吗?法律是可改变的吗?
Well, apparently Richard in real life did not refuse to make those changes. And imagine, in a book that then undergoes this publishing history that I have described, this is kind of a symbolic scene.
很明显,现实生活中的理查,并没有拒绝那些修改,想像一下,经历上述出版过程的一本书,这是象征性的场景。
What we're going to do is take this plasmid, with its promoter gene construct in it and engineer it, to take out the lacZ gene, leaving in the promoter and putting in the protein that we want - the gene for the protein that we want.
我们要做的就是提取包含,它自己的启动子基因的质粒,并对其进行一些修改,剔除lacZ基因,留下启动子,把我们的目标蛋白植入--,我们生产目标蛋白的基因
You might conclude that these features are evidence of multiple authorship a good deal of revision which points itself to a kind of composite structure different layers maybe, different sources.
所以这些特点会让你认为有很多作者,很多次的修改,会让结构看起来世合并而成的,不同的层次,不同的素材。
So you know from algebra I can't actually solve this. There may be multiple solutions to this. What would I have to do to change my code? And the answer is fortunately not a lot.
我解不出来方程,可能会有多组答案,我需要怎样修改我的代码呢?,很幸运的,答案是不用修改很多。
So, I don't even have to worry because you're not writing this down, so I can just fix it when I post the notes and no one will ever know, except that this is not OpenCourseWare.
所以我甚至不用担心,因为你们不会把这个写下来,所以我可以在我给出讲义的时候再修改,而且不会有人知道,但除非这不是公开课。
Think about the fix, don't make the first change that comes to mind and see if it works.
好好考虑要做什么修改,别抱着试试的态度直接实施。
That revisions may have been made, so that you might have different sources that have been revised or put together in different ways. Right?
这些修订,以便于你可以对,不同的素材,以不同方式,进行修改或者重组?
All right. What do you do when you've found the bug and you need to fix it?
好了,当你发现错误并修改它们的时候,你该怎么做?记住一个古老的法则?
So we revise the personality theory to say, the secret to personal identity is having the same personality-- provided that there's no branching.
所以我们对人格理论稍作修改,提出人格理论的秘诀在于-,给人格提供无分支的前提。
So we're going to have to revise the P-functioning or the end of P-functioning theory of death.
我们要修改人格功能,或者人格功能的完结代表死亡这一说法。
So I could get to that object either through this path or through that path, it didn't matter which path I use to modify it, I would see it when I looked at the other. Yes.
另外一条绑定获得这个对象,无论我通过哪个绑定来修改它,我都能在两个绑定中都看到做的改变,是这样的。
That generally is just modifying a few bytes, a few kilobytes worth of information.
这个操作通常只是修改了几个,或者几千字节的有价值的信息。
In this case it says, this is a syntax error, and it's actually highlighting where it came from so I can go back and fix it.
在这个例子中它显示这是个语法错误,并且会高亮显示它的位置,以便于我去修改。
Ask yourself, will it fix all of the symptoms you've seen?
你第一个想到的修改方案,它能否解决你看到的所有症状?如果不行?
So that's the marginal improvement here and we've seen this syntax before.
所以这有少量的修改,我们之前遇到过这个语法。
But refining in just the right way is going to turn out to be a surprisingly not straightforward matter, at least that's how it seems to me.
但是让人惊讶的是,要正确地修改它,并不是那么直接而简单的,至少在我看来不是。
Well,maybe what we should have to do is revise the claim yet again.
也许我们要做的事再度修改这个说法。
Texts were modified in the course of their transmission.
因此,在传播的过程中,经文被修改了。
And again, a related problem that people run into is side-effects. You call a function and it returns a value, but maybe it, on purpose or on accident, modifies one of the actual parameters.
另外,一个人们常碰到的相关问题,就是副作用,你调用一个函数它返回一个值,但是故意或者无意的,它可能会修改一个实参的值。
Antiquity or tradition alone is no justification yet at the same time he seems to recognize that changes in law even when the result : is improvement are dangerous. He writes "It is a bad thing to habituate people to reckless dissolution of laws.
作为借口,但同时,他似乎也体认到法律修改,就算结果是改善,仍是很危险的作法,他写到,“让人民习惯于鲁莽的法律,崩溃是不好的事。
Now finally swap has the ability, the power, to modify memory that isn't his own, that's not in his own scope because we've passed it in by address.
最终swap有能力,来修改不属于它的内存,不在它的作用域中,因为我们是通过地址传递的。
And I picked looking at methane so we could see if there are other factors that we're not considering, that we need to maybe tweak our model a little bit, and I think we'll find that we do if we take a look at a polyatomic molecule, methane, CH4 so c h 4.
我选择甲烷这个例子,我们可以看到,如果有一些我们没有考虑到的因素,我们需要修改一下我们的模型,我们看一看,甲烷CH4这个多原子分子,就会知道这一点,甲烷。
应用推荐