• For a real gas it depends on more than the temperature STUDENT: Are there any other constraints similar to that .

    而对实际气体,这是不对的,它的内能不仅仅依赖于温度,学生:有其他,类似的约束吗?

    麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

  • But it's not quite true, because typically what they actually do that, is they say it's adjusted for risk.

    但是这是不对的,因为它们实际上就是存在这种情况,它们会根据风险进行调整。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • So I mean philosophy can talk about how do we know we got a table here between us. Right?

    比如,哲学可以告诉我们是怎么感知到,我们之间有一个桌子,对不对

    普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

  • And they said, "Well, I'm sorry you feel that way, it's incorrect, and you have to take it anyway."

    但他们说:“很抱歉你那么像,这是不对滴,你一定要学它“

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • I don't want somebody opening up a clamshell with some hot food in it. It's not right. It's not right.

    我不希望任何人打开一罐蛤壳,里面装着热的食物,这不对

    麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

  • Now,it's very tempting at this point to say,look,of course Nothing could be easier ? Just imagine being in heaven forever,right?

    现在我很想说,当然了,这没什么难的,只要想象永远在天堂就行了对不对

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • He says it's a good idea for people to save for their retirement during their earning years but it's wrong.

    他说,让人们在能挣钱的年头为退休而攒钱,社保的初衷是好的,但这样做不对

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • Yes. I'm glad you actually asked me about that because, as I said it, I realized it wasn't quite right.

    很好,非常高兴你能问我这个问题,因为我之前说过这话,但我认识到这话是不对

    耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

  • So it's this interesting scenario where it's probably hit or miss, certainly early on and as one of the clips they are indicated, these are the kinds of things where computers ideally have to learn overtime.

    因此,这是一个有意思的事情,因为它有可能是投其所好或者不对其胃口,当然继续,正如其中一个短片所示,这些东西需要计算机,花一些时间去学习。

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • I said that if I was really hygienic, and you can now wonder about how often do I shower?

    但是这真的很棒,对不对?,那么为什么我要说这些呢?,我说过如果我真的很讲卫生的话?

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • Yeah. So the answer, in case you didn't hear it, was, again, if I'm a gambling person, I could start like a way down here.

    答案是,如果我是一个赌徒,我可以再这边开始对不对?,如果我在赌博,我会说,嘿。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • He needs to know about the structures of the molecules, because if the structure is wrong it's not going to work.

    他想要让它们成键,他需要知道分子结构,因为如果结构不对

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • So the first thing we'll do is, we'll print the element, in this case it will be a list right? Because it's a list with two lists in it.

    因此这儿我们要做的第一件事,就是要显示元素,在这儿元素就是数组了对不对?,因为这个数组包含了两个数组。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • On the other hand, it doesn't seem so plausible, it doesn't seem intuitively right, to say that they're alive.

    另一方面来说,却不太可行,说他们还活着,直观上就不对

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • So, that might be a complete lie but I think the numbers are now 64 bits, so we'll see, I'll take a look.

    所以说,我可能说的都不对,但是我认为现在恐怕已经有64位了,大家可以自己去看一下。

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • It seems to me that Princeton University had a reputation nationally for a country club environment whether that was ever legitimate, which I don't think so.

    我觉得普林斯顿大学,在国内都被称为有着乡村俱乐部的氛围,先不管这么说对不对,我本人是持否定意见。

    普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

  • If it were just a little bit different I could say, all right, I have a different approximation. But when it's this different, something is wrong. Right?

    但是如果仅仅有点差异的话,我可以认为没什么大问题,我得到了一个不太一样的估算,但这确实有差异,出问题了对不对

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • It still seems wrong in a way that it doesn't seem wrong in the first case to turn, you say.

    反正就是不对,而在第一种情况,这样做就是对的,是吧。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • OK. Now, having said that, and I've actually got a subtlety I'm going to come back to in a second, there ought to be a better way to do this. OK?

    我们已经明白了一些,一会儿要讲的微妙之处,应该有更好的方法对不对?,应该有更好的思路的?

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • So I'm first going to look for something that's not in the list, I'm going to see, is minus 1 in this list, so it's going to be at the far end, and if I do that in the basic case, bam.

    如果我试试第一种最基本的方法,噢,一下就完成了对不对?,因为这种方法查了下第一个元素,然后发现目标数比较下,因为目标数小于第一个元素。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • Then if I'm looking for the square root of something less than 1, I know it will be in my region, right?

    如果我要求平方根的数小于,我就知道我们的答案应该,在0-1这个区间了,对不对

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • Well, you could just try it and see if it works, right? That's what testing is all about.

    你可以仅仅的去试试运行程序,然后看看结果对不对?这就是测试的内容。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • And so to deal with this last one, you need to develop style. All right?

    因为为了对付最后的这种问题,你需要形成一种风格对不对

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • OK? All right. x 3, as you can see right here, does exactly that.

    你们可以看到,就是这么做的对不对

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • So halfway is the right thing to do, because at each step, I'm guaranteed to throw away at least half the list. Right? And that's nice.

    一半以上的元素,对不对?,这很棒,好,大家猜猜这个算法的增长率是多少?,为什么?太对了。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • I mean there are definitely other ways around that and by justifying, no, hang on, hang on, before you laugh at me.

    我是说,一定有其他变通的办法,通过判定。。。,不对不对,等等,趁没嘲笑我前我先改正。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • So the basic idea was fine, but I failed to satisfy the initial condition that the answer had to be between the lower bound and the upper bound. Right?

    因此基础的思想是对的,但是程序没能满足,正确答案在给定的区间内这个条件,对不对

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • At least, that's how it seems to me, though as I say, there are philosophers that say, "No, no. That's not right.

    至少,在我看来行不通,尽管像我说的,有些哲学家说过,不 不 那不对

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • I want to then do, I need to find the square root b squared plus h squared, right?

    我接下来要求b的平方和h的平方,的和的平方根对不对

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • If it's the value I'm looking for, boy, I ought to go to Vegas, I'm really lucky.

    我可能要去赌城赌一把了,我太幸运了,然后算法就结束了对不对

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定