It's about eight years after Comus.
在《Comus》成书8年之后。
You'll remember that Milton published Comus in 1637.
你们应当记得弥尔顿是在1637年发表了《科玛斯》。
So this is line 768 of Comus, and in the Hughes edition it's on page 108.
科玛斯》的第768行，休斯版本的第108页。
I know we haven't gotten to Comus yet, but I'm trying to put this in to context.
我知道我们还没有讲到《Comus》，但我试着把这个放在上下文中来讲。
Now as I noted earlier, there's a difference between the two existing texts of Milton's Comus.
正如我之前提到的，弥尔顿《科玛斯》的现存两个版本间有差异。
At times when we read Paradise Lost it seems almost as if Satan were quoting or alluding to Comus.
有时当我们读《失乐园》时，就好像看到Satan在引用Comus的话或影射他。
Look at line 423 of Comus, where the elder brother explains that the chaste Lady can actually travel anywhere she pleases utterly unafraid.
看到《科玛斯》的第423行，大哥哥解释说，贞节的女士实际上可以毫不畏惧地到她愿意的任何地方旅行。
So I want to propose that the literary traditions' renaming of this piece from a Mask to Comus is more than just a slip, or more than just a random shift of terms or of names.
所以我想提出，从面具到Comus的文学传统的重命名，不仅仅是一个失误，更不仅仅是一个术语或名称的随机变化。
So I want to propose that the literary traditions' renaming of this piece from a Mask to Comus is more than just a slip, or more than just a random shift of terms or of names.
所以我想提出，从面具到Comus的文学传统的重命名，不仅仅是一个失误，更不仅仅是一个术语或名称的随机变化。
应用推荐