至于那些对技术没有偏见(既不偏爱技术，也不反对技术)的人，他们的看法大致在这两种极端的观点之间。

For those who have no prejudice in favor of or against technology, the truth is to be found somewhere between these two extreme views.

youdao

It's practically impossible to begin a reading of Milton without the burden of innumerable prejudices and preconceptions.

想要不带大量的偏见或成见的解读米尔顿,几乎是不可能的。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

And scholarship of the nineteenth century and most of the twentieth century is generally characterized by a deep-seated bias that views impurity rules as primitive and irrational taboos, and sacrifice as controlled savagery that's empty of any spiritual meaning.

十九世纪和二十世纪的大部分时期,学术界都有一个,很深层的偏见，那就是认为不纯的规则是,原始且无理的，献祭是野蛮人才干得出来的,无任何精神意义的活动。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

The historical critical method, and the documentary hypothesis in particular, are not inherently biased, I want to make that point very strongly. They are simply analytical tools: look at the text and its features and draw some conclusions based on what you're finding.

这里我想要特别强调的是，历史的批判性研究方法,尤其是底本学说，本身是不带偏见的,它们只是分析工具，对文本及其特征进行评判,然后根据你的发现作出结论。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选