So it is simultaneously in his very first sentence a Marxist and a Darwinian vocabulary that Eikhenbaum is invoking, and that's what partly accounts for the strenuousness of his rhetoric.

所以艾肯鲍姆文章的第一句话同时引用了，达尔文主义和马克思主义，这部分解释了为什么，他的文章读起来那么吃力。

youdao

Those titles that Eikhenbaum keeps talking about -how Don Quixote was Made, how Gogol's Overcoat was Made - reflect the preoccupation of the Russian formalists with how literature is put together.

艾肯·鲍姆总谈论，堂吉诃德，果戈理的外套是是怎么塑造的-，这反映了俄国形式主义者，对文本组合方式的执着。

youdao

It's this basic antagonism, this difference of opinion, that Eikhenbaum wants to focus on and, indeed, does focus on.

这就是艾肯鲍姆的反对者的，基本意见，针对这点，艾肯鲍姆将反对付诸行动了。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Now "The Theory of the Formal Method," Eikhenbaum's essay that you've read for today, was written in 1927.

这篇，形式语言学理论“,是艾肯鲍姆，在1927年写的。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Nobody can possibly miss in reading Eikhenbaum's rhetorically rather bizarre essay his obsession with struggle, with the fight, and with doing battle.

读完艾肯鲍姆,那篇修辞古怪的文章后，没有人会注意不到他对斗争和挣扎的热衷。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选