旨在研究错误信念任务的有效性。
This study is designed to explore the validity of false belief task.
语言能力超常组在错误信念任务上的表现显著好于普通语言能力组幼儿；
The Performance of Young Children with Different Language Ability in the Nonverbal and Verbal False Belief Tasks;
研究程序包括假装游戏的拍摄、麦卡锡幼儿言语智力测验和两类标准错误信念任务。
All subjects are videotaped for pretend play and measured upon MSCA-CR Verbal Test and standard false belief tasks.
另一种任务，已经被应用过了成百上千次，叫做“错误信念任务”，任务是这样的。
Another sort of task, which is a task that's been done hundreds, perhaps thousands of times, is known as "the false-belief task" and here's the idea.
采用简化的错误信念任务，考察了90名3～5岁幼儿对自己或他人信念证伪引发的惊奇情绪认知及其错误信念理解。
Naxi and 90 Han children(3 to 5 years old) participated in this research, and their emotion understanding, false belief understanding and language abilities were measured.
探讨3—5岁儿童在标准错误信念任务与错误信念行为解释任务上表现的一致性问题；从错误信念行为这个新的角度，比较儿童对自己行为动机和对他人行为动机的关注程度；
We examined 3- to 5-year-old children's understanding of their own and another's false beliefs in two experiments using diverse deceptive box task and false-belief-based actions task.
结果表明：幼儿的表现仍存在任务特异性，并且实验材料对儿童的外表-事实区分和错误信念认识具有重要影响。
The results also showed that there was a great material effect on young children's performance on both appearance-reality distinction tasks and false belief understanding tasks.
意外转移任务的错误信念显著难于欺骗外表任务的错误信念。
False belief of "unexpected transfer" tasks was more difficult to answer than the false belief of "deceptive appearance" tasks.
意外转移任务的错误信念显著难于欺骗外表任务的错误信念。
False belief of "unexpected transfer" tasks was more difficult to answer than the false belief of "deceptive appearance" tasks.
应用推荐