• If I understand it correctly, science as science insofar as its belike scientific methodology, he needs to be defended.

    如果我没有弄错的话,就论文所用的科学方法本身而言,就论文所用的科学方法本身而言,作者的立场应该受到维护。

    普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

  • Right. Well, I think that pluralism properly understood has respect for people with the secular position, with the Christian position.

    是的,我认为经合理理解的多元主义,尊重持世俗立场的人们,尊重持基督教立场的人们。

    普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

  • Now the Church of England establishment always countered these puritan treatises in attack of their position.

    现在英国的教会当局,总是在清教徒的立场上对他们的论文进行反击。

    耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

  • And again, we're not saying choosing 2 beats choosing 1, 2 wins against 1 or 9 wins against 10.

    我们不是说选立场2会击败选立场1的,选立场2能赢立场1的,或者选立场9能赢选立场10的

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • And another option which I'm interested in from the standpoint of my own research is you could see them as disgusting.

    另一个我感兴趣的方法,是来自我自己的研究立场,这个方法就是对他们感到反感。

    耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

  • It's a very powerful argument that, in a way, Socrates makes against himself, putting that speech in the mouth of the laws.

    这是很有力的申论,在某种程度上,苏格拉底自我违抗,转而以法律的立场说话。

    耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

  • We'll be seeing this kind of argument and people presenting positions about it going on into the future.

    我们会不断地看到这种观点,而且人们会始终表达关于这一问题的立场

    耶鲁公开课 - 古希腊历史简介课程节选

  • The great creator raised his sinuous, powerful, flexible arm, and we know where we stand.

    伟大的造物主抬起了他弯曲的,有力的,灵活的手臂,我们知道了我们的立场

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • So he offers a series of arguments for that conclusion, for that position, and starting next time, we'll work our way through those arguments.

    因而他给出一系列论证,来证明这个结论,证明这个立场,下节课开始,我们将讨论这些论证

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • I don't think I have a clearly defined position which makes me different from some parties to the dispute, whether it's political or cultural or religious.

    但我不认为自己有一个特定的立场,将我和其他人区分开来,无论是从政治上,文化上还是宗教上。

    普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

  • So he says that position 1, strategy 1, choosing the most extreme left wing position is a dominated strategy.

    他说到立场1,也就是策略1,即选择最极端的左翼立场,是劣势策略

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Once you delete the dominated strategies, then you kind of go through it again and then 2 is dominated by 3.

    一旦你剔除了劣势策略,再次审视这个博弈时,立场2劣势于立场3

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Again, all the people at 1, all the people at 2, and half the people at 3, so that's 25%.

    就是立场1和立场2的全部票数,加上立场3票数一半,一共是25%

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Let me give you an account of myself and let me establish the reasons why you need to go on listening to me and why you should believe my position on this or that political or ecclesiastical topic."

    让我向你们介绍一下自己,然后说明,为什么你们要继续听我说以及为什么,你们要相信我的政治或宗教立场,“

    耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

  • But it's been very interesting to me and researching this book, you can see how there are very many sides within specific religious communities.

    但我对此很有兴趣,研究一下这本书,你会发现,立场观点是多么地五花八门,各个宗教团体内都是如此。

    普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

  • The Second Brother, you'll remember, had taken what I take to be the perfectly reasonable position, the cautious position, that the Lady is in danger - that she's a sitting duck, in fact, out there in the dangerous forest.

    戏中的弟弟,你们记得,采取了,我认为非常合理的立场,小心谨慎的立场,他认为那位少女处于危险的境地,-她只身于危险的丛林之中,极易受到伤害。

    耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

  • Hang on a second, everyone see that 10 is going to be dominated by 9 in exactly the same way?

    稍等一下,大家都应该能看出来同样的,立场9优于立场10对吗

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • We've argued that once we realize those aren't going to be played, that 2 and 9 aren't going to be played.

    我们明白了一旦我们知道了,无人会采用那些策略时,那么也没有人会选立场2和9

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • The payoff of 2 against 3 is all the people at 1, all the people at 2, so it's 20%.

    如果对手选3而我选2我会得到,立场1和2的全部选票,一共20%

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So not only was he choosing a position close to the Conservatives: he was choosing exactly their position.

    他不只是选了一个临近保守派的立场,他选的就是一个保守派的立场

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So once again what this idea is this idea is you yourself should not play a dominated strategy.

    所以再次强调,站在我们自己的立场上说,我们不应采用劣势策略

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • The position that Milton -- this is how I like to read it - the position that Milton would like to be able to take on this question of virtue's reward is formulated by the Elder Brother in Comus.

    弥尔顿的立场--我下面要读,-弥尔顿关于贞操的报偿这一问题的立场,通过《科玛斯》中的哥哥这一角色表达出来。

    耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

  • If your opponent doesn't choose 1 or 2, then you're always going to be 5% better off if you choose 2 than 1.

    如果你的对手不选1立场或者2,你选择立场2总会比选择,立场1多得到5%的选票

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • We're saying choosing 2 always does better than choosing 1, regardless of what the other person chooses.

    我们说选立场2总是优于立场1,无论对手如何选择

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Half the people at 3, so that comes out as 25% and once again and so on.

    以及立场3的一半选票,这样一来,我得到25%的选票,依次类推

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • These are just two incompatible moral positions that Machiavelli states but he goes further than this.

    这是马基雅维利所言的两种不可调和的,对立道德立场,但是他并未就此善罢甘休。

    耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

  • 5% of the votes which is actually lower, so it's clear that 3 doesn't dominate 2.

    我会少获得5%而得到85%的选票,所以说立场3不优于立场2

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Yes, sure. Most of this opposition comes from people who are critical of places where I depart from the traditional ethic of the thing to do for human life.

    当然可以,大多数的反对观点,都来自于这样的人,他们批评说,我的立场偏离了,关于如何对待人类的生命的传统伦理。

    普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

  • A candidate could say during an election that "I'm a moderate candidate, I'm at position 5" but you might not believe him or her.

    一个候选人在整个大选中可能说,我是个中立的候选人,我的立场是5,但你不一定就相信他/她的说法

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Though he sometimes does talk about texts that we call "literary," indeed he very often does, nevertheless Derrida's position and the logic of that position suggest that we can't really reliably discriminate among genres.

    尽管他有时确实会讨论被我们称为“文学“的文本“,事实上他经常如此,然而德里达的立场和他立场的逻辑,是我们不能够明确地划分文学的体裁。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定