But it's also interesting that he says he trusted that traditional living voice more than he trusted written documents.
同样有意思的是,他说自己更相信,口述传统而不是文献。
You really believe, and it is in fact the case that the things written down in the envelope are true.
你真的相信,而事实上,信封里写的那些事都是真的。
In the works that Milton is going to be publishing now with greater and greater frequency, it's this Spenserian ideal of marriage that will be the new and, believe me, the endlessly complex Miltonic subject.
在弥尔顿准备出版的作品中,越来越常出现的,是斯宾塞式的婚姻理想,那将是崭新的,相信我,也是无尽而复杂的弥尔顿风格的题材。
But the best life, Thrasymachus believes, it doing maximum injustice to others, doing whatever you like.
而他相信,最好的人生是尽极对他人做出不公,为所欲为。
most people around the world, all religions and most people in most countries at most times, believe that people can survive the destruction of their bodies.
世界上大多数人,在大多数时间里,多数国家的所有宗教,以及绝大多数人民,都相信人们能够做到身体消亡而灵魂不灭
You can be a product of the Enlightenment, with a faith in reason, and not become a Romantic who begins to believe in the possibilities of man, or even the perfectibility of man.
你是启蒙运动的产物,带着对理智的信心,而不是相信一个,相信人类无所不能,甚至人的完善性的浪漫主义者
And nobody knows, nobody believes that we can cut spending, right? -Somebody down the road has to pay the bills Somebody down the road has to pay the bills, either by cutting spending, cutting benefits or raising taxes.
而几乎没人相信,政府能够成功节流,不是吗?,-那总得,有人来埋单啊,迟早要有人来为此埋单的,要么精简政府开支,削减福利,要么增税。
Perhaps the argument should be, "We have to believe in souls because no mere physical object, no machine could feel."
而应该是,我们不得不相信灵魂,因为所有物理对象,所有的机器都没有感觉
And the crucial question, presumably, is, "Should we believe in the existence of a soul?"
而最为关键的,也许是,我们应该相信灵魂是存在的吗
The first possibility was the claim was, Nobody believes that they'll ever cease to exist as a person.
第一个可能是,没有人相信自己会作为个人而死亡。
And deception defined broadly is simply to act or be in some way that fools others into believing or thinking or responding to something that's false.
而广义上的欺骗是以愚弄的方式,使他人相信虚假之事,认为虚假之事是真实的,或是使他人对虚假之事做出反应。
Logically speaking, you could believe some of these things and not all of them.
理论上来讲,你可以相信一部分而不是全部。
How do we get from there to the conclusion that I can't believe that I'm going to die, I'm going to cease to exist as a person?
怎样从中得到一个结论,说明我不相信我会死,我会停止作为人而存在?
Why should we believe Hobbes' story ? and not some other story?
为什么我们要相信霍布斯的故事,而不相信其他的故事?
So we're justified in believing in germs, but not demons.
所以,我们相信微生物理论合理,而恶魔理论则不合理
Nobody really believes this,that we all die alone.
没人真正相信我们都会孤独而死一事。
Why would you reject dualism in favor of this alternative?
为什么你要反对二元论而相信这个
So he says, no one would take seriously the proposal that a human organism learns through experience to have arms rather than wings, or that the basic structure of particular organs results from accidental experience.
他认为,没人会相信人体组织通过学习经验,长出了手臂而不是翅膀,或者特定器官的基本结构,是偶然经验的结果
This is the claim--not that nobody believes they're going to die; that's the one we've been talking about for the last lecture or so--but instead, the claim that everybody dies alone.
这论点是这样的,不同于我们以前所讲的;,没有人相信自己会死亡,而是说每个人都是孤独而死的。
Well,a fan of the claim that we all die alone might come back and say, Well,in the case of the string quartet, although it's true that I am playing with others, somebody could take my part.
一个相信人是孤独而死的人也许会说,在弦乐四重奏的例子中,虽然我确实是在和其他人一起演奏,有人是可以替代我的。
It's natural to talk that way, but if we want belief in the soul to help us hold out the possibility at least that there might be life after death, then I think we need to actually say that strictly speaking, it's not that a person is a soul plus a body.
这说起来很轻松,如果我们想要寄托于,相信灵魂的存在,而让死后能够继续活着有据可依,那么我们需要一个严格的说法,不是说一个人是灵魂加肉体
If we could find the right F, and make out the argument, the physicalist can't explain it or does a bad job of explaining it and the dualist does a better job of explaining it, we'd have reason to believe in the soul.
如果我们能找到合适的特性F,并且给出论证,物理主义者无法解释,或者解释得很牵强,而二元论的解释更合理,那么我们就有理由相信有灵魂存在
应用推荐