• What about Mill's attempt to account for the especially weighty character of individual rights and justice in chapter five of Utilitarianism.

    那么穆勒在《功利主义》,第五章中提到的,个人权利和公正重要性的解释,又是否成立呢。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • Another illustration of the difficulty of translating all values, in this case, a certain idea of virtue, into utilitarian terms.

    这个例子再次说明,很难把所有的价值,此处特指某种德行,转换为功利主义形式。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • When we finished last time, we were looking at John Stuart Mill's attempt to reply to the critics of Bentham's Utilitarianism.

    上节课结束时,我们讲到约翰·斯图尔特·穆勒试图回应,对边沁功利主义的批判。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • So what we need to examine now is whether John Stuart Mill had a convincing reply to these objections to utilitarianism.

    我们现在的任务是思考穆勒,是否令人信服地回应了对功利主义的质疑。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • How many think that it does succeed of arguing within utilitarian terms for a distinction between higher and lower pleasures?

    有多少人觉得它成功地,在功利主义范畴区分了高级和低级快乐?

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • The Benthamite utilitarian says everybody's preferences count and they count regardless of what people want, regardless of what makes different people happy.

    边沁功利主义者认为每个人的偏好都有意义,不论人们所欲何为,不论其喜好各有不同。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • Does it mean that we're back to utilitarianism and using people and aggregating preferences and pushing the fat man off the bridge?

    那是否意味着我们又回到了功利主义的老路上,利用他人,还简单加总偏好,把那个胖子从桥上推下去?

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • It comes from personal experience that raises a question at least about whether all values can be translated without loss into utilitarian terms.

    是亲身见闻所引起的疑问,是否所有的价值都可以完好无损地,转换为功利主义的形式。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • But then, page eight, also in chapter two, he argues that it is possible for a utilitarian to distinguish higher from lower pleasures.

    但在第八页,即第二章中,他提出功利主义者可以区分,高级和低级快乐。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • So justice is higher, individual rights are privileged, but not for reasons that depart from utilitarian assumptions.

    所以公正是更高级的,个体权利是种特权,但并不能出于功利主义假设之外的理由。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • Now, those among you who are defenders of utilitarianism may think that this is an unfair test.

    在座功利主义的支持者们,可能觉得这个研究不公。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • She and Mill got married, they lived happily ever after, and it was under her influence that John Stuart Mill tried to humanize utilitarianism.

    他们结了婚,从此过上了幸福的生活,正是在她的影响下,约翰·斯图尔特·穆勒试图把功利主义人性化。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • How can a utilitarian distinguish qualitatively higher pleasures from lesser ones, base ones, unworthy ones? Yes?

    功利主义者何以将性质上更高级的快乐,与较低级,基本无价值的区分开呢,请说?

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • Bentham's utilitarianism is sometimes summed up with the slogan "The greatest good for the greatest number."

    边沁的功利主义有时被总结为一句口号,为最多的人谋求最大的幸福“

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • But times have changed and they were embarrassed to give the true grounds for their objection and so they translated their arguments into utilitarian terms.

    但时代不同了,她们羞于讲出反对的真实理由,就转换为功利主义形式表达反对。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • As for Jeremy Bentham, who launched utilitarianism as a doctrine in moral and legal philosophy, 85 Bentham died in 1832 at the age of 85.

    杰里米·边沁,确立了功利主义,作为道德和法律哲学学说的地位,边沁死于1832年,享年。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • And starting next time, we're going to read Bentham and John Stuart Mill, utilitarian philosophers.

    下讲开始,我们将开始阅读边沁,约翰·斯图尔特·穆勒等功利主义哲学家的著作。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • Last time, we began to consider some objections to Jeremy Bentham's version of utilitarianism.

    上节课,我们开始思考一些,对杰里米·边沁功利主义的反对观点。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • How many disagree with the utilitarian approach to law and to the common good?

    有多少人不同意,功利主义在法律及公共利益方面的做法?

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • And if they can't, what are the consequences for the utilitarian theory of morality?

    如果不能,那么功利主义道德理论意义何在?

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • So here are the objections to Bentham's utilitarianism and now, we turn to someone who tried to respond to those objections, a latter-day utilitarian, John Stuart Mill.

    以上就是对边沁功利主义的异议,现在再来看看另一位,他试图回应这些异议,近代功利主义者约翰·斯图尔特·穆勒。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • In his book Utilitarianism, Mill tries to show that critics to the contrary it is possible within the utilitarian framework to distinguish between higher and lower pleasures.

    在穆勒的《功利主义》中,他试图证明,与批判者所言相反,在功利主义的框架下,是能区分高级和低级快乐的。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • The first was the objection, the claim that utilitarianism, " by concerning itself with the greatest good for the greatest number, fails adequately to respect individual rights.

    第一点异议,是说功利主义,只关注“为最多的人谋求最大的幸福,没有充分地尊重个人权利。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • Can you give an example of the kind of thing you're worried about when you say you're worried about utilitarianism violating the concern or respect due the minority?

    你能举个你所担心的类似例子吗,即你所说的担心,功利主义缺少对少数的关心和尊重?

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • Or do you think this completely destroys the whole utilitarian calculus?

    还是你们认为它完全推翻了,功利主义的演算?

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • Last time, we began to consider Bentham's version of utilitarianism.

    上节课,我们开始,思考边沁的功利主义

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • So we really have here two different objections to utilitarianism.

    因此我们确实对功利主义有两点异议。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • Is this a counterexample to the utilitarian idea of calculating?

    这算是功利主义计算思路的反例吗?

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • And if you were a utilitarian, what would you do?

    如果你是个功利主义者,你会怎么办?

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定