Now here's a question for you guys, which we're going to vote on, so you better start thinking about it.

现在我希望，大家来，判断一下。

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

I think if we force people to vote, it would not lead to a good result.

如果我们采取强制投票，结果也不会多好。

对于义务投票制 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

We're also going to assume, just as we did last time, that voters are going to vote for the closest candidate.

我们还要假设,像上次一样,选民会选择离他最近的候选人

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Because even in the Clinton Administration, around 1997, after we refused to vote for the International Criminal Court.

因为即使在克林顿执政期间，大约在1997年左右，在我们拒绝,给国际刑事法庭投票之后。

普林斯顿公开课 - 国际座谈会课程节选

I think that at least for many of us, there is a sort of logical conundrum we go through and that is, if good people don't vote then we'll be in a bad world; so I have to vote to prove that good people vote, then maybe it will happen.

我想,至少对大部分人来说,必须面对一个逻辑上的难题,就是,如果好人不投票,那我们将会生活在坏人操纵的世界里,所以我必须要投票,来证明好人会投票,那未来的国家将会由好人掌控

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

Surely, you would all agree that we shouldn't put the right to individual liberty up to a vote.

选民们，你们肯定都赞同,不该以投票来决定个人自由。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

I think we all vote and amend and have activism of our values, religious or not.

我们每个人都有投票权，希望实现,我们自己的价值观，不管这是否牵扯到宗教。

普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

we have a homecoming queen that all the sororities and people get to vote on,

所有的联谊会与人们都能投票推选返校女王，

对于返校日 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

We're going to assume that voters will eventually vote for the closest candidate.

我们假设,选民会投票给离他们最近的候选人

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So we'll assume that they're trying to maximize their share of the vote.

所以我们假设他们会尽可能地,最大化自己的得票数

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

From here on down, if I bothered to do it, we'd find that choosing 3 always gets me 5% more of the vote than I would have had from choosing 2, against any of these higher numbers.

如果我不怕麻烦 我能一直这么写下去,我们发现选择立场3总是比选择立场2,使我多获得5%的选票,在对手选更靠后的立场的情况下

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选