All right,so that's the best way for the personality theory to get revised to deal with this problem.

好了，这就是人格理论调整后,解决这个问题最好的答案。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So you have to think, first of all, what you want the best for yourself, and in food , in other things, too.

你得考虑，首先，你自己最想要的是什么，在食物和其他方面。

问上门厨师 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

I'm putting Freud here but what I mean is well-known defenders of Freud will make some claims like: adult personality traits are shaped by the course of psychosexual development; all dreams are disguised wish fulfillment; psychoanalysis is the best treatment for mental disorders.

我虽然在这里说的是弗洛伊德,其实指的是那些著名的弗洛伊德的拥护者,他们会总结出这样的观点：,成年人的人格特质,是在性心理的发展过程中形成的;,所有的梦境都是愿望满足的伪装;,精神分析是治疗心理障碍的最佳手段。

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

I've deleted all the strategies that were best, that are never best responses for Player I and all the strategies that are never best responses for Player II, and what I've got left is that little box.

我剔除了所有策略,所有非参与人I最佳对策的策略,还有非参与人II最佳对策的策略,最后只剩下了这个小方格

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

If Player II chooses 4, then the synergy leads Player I to raise his best response all the way up to 2, but these strategies up here above 2 are never a best response for Player I. Is that right?

如果参与人II选4,协同导致,参与人I的最佳对策变成2,参与人I的那些大于2的策略,也永远不会成为最佳对策,对不对

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选