The United States Supreme Court has cited unratified treaties (and even an African treaty), and various contemporary foreign law sources, as guidance for interpreting United States constitutional provisions.
This amendment would have the effect of furthering an increasingly common Clinton Administration gambit: to implement its agenda through executive orders and by expending funds and otherwise adjusting federal programs to make them conform to unratified treaty requirements.
The net effect of both, however, would be to advance an agenda that has become increasingly commonplace as the Clinton Administration has striven to accomplish its agenda through executive orders and by expending funds and otherwise adjusting federal programs to make them conform to unratified treaty requirements.