这里本来是很平衡的，因为上次我们提到保罗·里克尔的时候，大意是说这些作者都是大师。

It would have been a perfect symmetry here, because last time we quoted Paul Ricoeur, the main point was that these authors were masters.

youdao

他们以为普里克尔斯已经葬身火海。

They thought Prickles had died in the fire.

youdao

正是这条巨大的围栏阻止了普里克尔斯找到回去的路。

It was this huge fencing that prevented Prickles from finding her way back.

youdao

It would have been a perfect symmetry because last time we quoted Paul Ricoeur to the effect that these authors, Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud, were--and this is Ricoeur's word--"masters."

这里其实是很平衡的,因为上次我们提到保罗，里克尔的时候大意是说这些作者，包括马克思，尼采和弗洛伊德，按里克尔的说法，都是大师“

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Now last time, following Ricoeur, I mentioned Marx, Nietzsche and Freud as key figures in the sort of secondary development that somehow inaugurates theory, and then I added Darwin.

上次继里克尔之后，我提到了马克思，尼采和弗洛伊德,把他们作为推动初始理论进一步发展的关键人物，之后我加上了达尔文。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Foucault couldn't possibly allow for that because plainly the whole texture of their discourse would be undermined by introducing the notion that it's okay to be a master, and yet Ricoeur feels that these figures dominate modern thought as masters.

福柯不会认同因为,这样的话他们话语的整个结构就会被破坏,如果引入可以作为大师的观点的话，同时,里克尔感觉这些人支配着现代大师的思想。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选