根据这个假设,习得过程用第二语言创造句子,对吧?
According to this hypothesis, the acquisition processes create sentences in the second language, right?
这个假设很有意义,可能是我们读过的所有理论中最有意义的。
That hypothesis makes a lot of sense, maybe the most sense of all the theories we read about.
艾伦的贡献在于提出了一个我们都认同的假设——因为我们不是机器人,所以我们控制自己的思想——并揭示了这个假设的错误本质。
Allen's contribution was to take an assumption we all share—that because we are not robots we therefore control our thoughts—and reveal its erroneous nature.
Right, having done that, we can certainly get to more complicated things, so for example, suppose I look at that expression.
好,说完了这一点,我们就可以讲些复杂些的话题了,例如,假设我看到了这个表达式。
If I charged the reactor in this manner, and of course I'm assuming 100% completion of the reaction which we know is overly optimistic.
如果我们这样来考虑这个反应的前提,就是我们假设,反应完全进行,我们知道这有些过于乐观了。
Suppose you could build a circuit with the following property: the input to this circuit would be any other circuit diagram.
假设你能用如下物品,建立起一个线路:,这个线路的输入设备,可以是任意一个其他线路的流程。
应用推荐