但是,爸爸,你的话很难讲的通。
这样讲的通吗?
在这当儿上,这是讲的通的......“如果我向她说明我的感觉,她也会告诉我她的感受。”
In the moment it sure seems to make sense... "If I show her how I feel, she'll return the feelings".
So if we understand the argument in terms of the second interpretation, it looks as invisible. It looks all the argument still go through, Simmias' counterexample fails.
所以如果我们以第二种解释,理解这个论证,灵魂是无形的,所有的论证仍然讲得通,西米亚斯的反例无效了。
That, in some ways, makes sense from a business perspective.
它……从很多方面来讲,这种做法在商业上都是讲得通的。
This intuitively should make a lot of sense, because we know we're trying to minimize electron repulsions to keep things in as low an energy state as possible, so it makes sense that we would put one electron in each orbital first before we double up in any orbital.
这个直观上讲得通,因为我们知道尝试去最小化电子排斥力,从而尽可能的保持处于一个较低的能态,所以它讲得通,在我们在同一个轨道放入两个电子之前,我们首先把电子放入每一个轨道。
应用推荐