公元前399年,一个叫莫勒图斯的年轻人在雅典状告哲学家苏格拉底,说他不信城邦诸神,引进新的精灵之事,败坏青年。于是,苏格拉底被传讯,在500人组成的陪审团面前作了著名的申辩。
如苏格拉底持非正统信念的个体,他们的观点,可能激励其它人反省,及内思,所有的好人,米尔顿,洛克及像伏尔泰等人,都做过类似的申辩。
Individuals of heterodox belief but whose own views may stimulate others to question and think for themselves, all to the good, Milton, John Locke, people like Voltaire argued something like this.
但柏拉图的苏格拉底必然不同于,亚里斯·多芬尼斯对苏格拉底的描述,后者将他描写成是,让虚弱申辩转强的诡辩家。
But Plato's Socrates is necessarily poles apart from Aristophanes' Socrates depiction of him as a sort of sophist who makes the weaker argument the stronger.
But Plato's Socrates is necessarily poles apart from Aristophanes' Socrates depiction of him as a sort of sophist who makes the weaker argument the stronger.
但柏拉图的苏格拉底必然不同于,亚里斯多芬尼斯对苏格拉底的描述,后者将他描写成是,让虚弱申辩转强的诡辩家。
The one thing that Plato does not argue is that Socrates should simply be tolerated.
柏拉图未申辩的一项,是未提及苏格拉底是否应就此被容忍。
In the first speech of the Apology, he defies the city to put him to death by expressing indifference to death and then in the Crito, he very much expresses that indifference to death by refusing to allow Crito to let him escape.
苏格拉底自辩篇》的第一场申辩中,他抗拒城邦处他死刑,理由是他根本漠视死亡,但之后在《克里托篇》,他表述漠视死亡的方式,变成拒绝让克里托助他逃亡。
应用推荐