“在如何定义MR上,各州不尽相同,”他继续谈到,“这些区别的关键之处在于被告可能在一州符合接受死刑的条件,在另一州则不然。
“States differ in how they define MR, ” he continued. “A bottom line on these differences is that a defendant may be eligible for the death penalty in one state, but not in another.
如果他们在被告知之后,还是想接受消融,那么对符合上述条件的这部分患者来说,消融就可以作为首选治疗。
If they, after this information, still want to undergo ablation then it's a reasonable treatment, as a first time treatment, but only in these selected patients.
应用推荐