实际上,这些是对同一样东西测估所采用的两种不同的方式,因此一种模型使用其中一种方式或是另一种对预测的结果没有任何影响。
Actually, these are two different ways of measuring the same thing, so whether a model USES one or the other should make no difference to its predictions.
考虑到我所确信的东西还要拿去重测,而且迭代越短,他们就需要更频繁地重测,我可不想放弃自动化测试。
Given that I'm convinced things need to be retested, and that the shorter the iteration the more frequently they need to be retested, I'm not willing to give up on automated tests.
所以人们发明的这个东西被称作测面器。
Gee, I wonder if I could come up with a set of transitions occurring inside atomic hydrogen Just right match that what Angstrom measured back in 1853.
嘿!我想知道我是否可以想出,发生在氢原子内的,一系列的跃迁,正好符合,阿姆斯特朗在1853年测得的东西。
应用推荐