他清楚地体认到,关于其武装先知标准的,例外情事。
He clearly recognizes that there are clear exceptions to his rule about armed prophets.
马奇亚·维利的武装先知,不只是一位歹徒,一如,Orson, Welles,之属。
Machiavelli's armed prophet is more than just a gangster, like Orson Welles in that part.
难道他没说过武装的先知总能取胜而,徒手的先知总是失败?,难道他没说过,他写作是为了揭示出事物的本来面目,证明事物并非人们幻想的那个样子?
Does he not say that armed prophets always win, the unarmed prophets lose? Did he not say that he wrote to reveal the effectual truth of things and? Not just what people have imagined the case to be?
Although this kind of talk about "armed prophets always win" is characteristic of Machiavelli, he likes this kind of tough talk.
虽然这种关于,“武装先知总是赢“的言论“,是马奇亚维利的特色,但他真的喜欢这种顽固的论调。
And it is here that Machiavelli introduces his famous distinction between armed and unarmed prophets.
也就在这个论点上,马奇亚维利推出他的著名区别定义,介于武装与非武先知之间。
He clearly recognizes that there are clear exceptions to his rule about armed prophets.
他清楚地体认到,关于其武装先知标准的,例外情事。
应用推荐