所以，《利未记》支持以拾遗的方式直接对穷人，进行施舍，有几分像福利制度，《申命记》考虑更多的，则是工作福利制度，事实上它从未提及穷人。

So Leviticus supports outright charity for the poor in the form of gleanings. Kind of a welfare system. Deuteronomy has more of a workfare system in mind; they actually never mention the poor.

youdao

有人说也许他意在映射妥拉的五经，它们是创世纪，出埃及记，利未记，民数记和申命记。

Some people say maybe he meant to reflect the five books of Torah the Pentateuch is the Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy.

youdao

同样地，所谓的摩西五经——《创世纪》，《出埃及记》《利未记》《民数记》《申命记》，无法被证实全部是摩西所写。

Similarly, the so-called five books of Moses — Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, nowhere claim to have been written in their entirety by Moses.

youdao

Similarly, the so-called five books of Moses--Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus,Numbers, Deuteronomy, nowhere claim to have been written in their entirety by Moses.

同样地，所谓的摩西五经--《创世纪》,《出埃及记》《利未记》《民数记》《申命记》,无法被证实全部是摩西所写。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

It's only Leviticus that mentions the poor. For Deuteronomy, it's those who really can't provide for themselves: the widow, the orphan and the stranger who may not be able to find employment.

提到穷人的只有《利未记》对《申命记》来说，却是那些真正没法供养自己的人，寡妇，孤儿，寄居的都是不能找到工作的人。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

As a result you have a lot of rural Levites who are out of business now, a lot of people who would have officiated at local shrines, and they're out of business: that probably explains the fact that Deuteronomy makes special provision for the Levites and includes them in its... in legislation, sort of social welfare legislation.

因此许多乡下的利未人丢掉了生计，许多在当地主持地方祭祀的人，也丢掉了生计：这也许解释了为什么,申命记中特别为利未人提供了给养,并把它写进了它的立法中，某种社会福利立法。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选