单元测试的正确方法是什么这个简单的函数(使用EF 5.0)或有意义的单元测试呢？

What is the correct way to unit test this simple function (using EF 5.0) or does it make sense to unit test?

youdao

根据前面简单的单元测试用例，这块代码是“干净，绿色”的——但只有在我真正彻底地测试这块代码的情况下这才有意义。

So the code is "clean and green," according to my simple unit test case — but that's meaningful only if I'm really testing the code thoroughly.

youdao

一旦确定了业务功能工作单元及服务，下一个步骤就是将这些活动组织到有意义的工作组中。

Once the business function work units and services are defined, the next step is to organize these activities into meaningful work groups.

youdao

What we're really getting at is the idea of saying I want to have a way of grouping together information into units that make sense. So I can go back to one of those topics we had at the beginning, which is the idea of abstraction, that I can create one of those units as a simple entity, bury away the details and write really modular code.

组合成为有意义的单元,那么这就让我们回到,一开始讲的话题之一了,这就是抽象的概念,也就是我可以以一个简单的，实体的形式创建这样的一个单元，把具体实现隐藏然后写一些,真正模块化的代码,我们在以后的课程中。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选