一些心理学杂志已经创建了激励机制来提高人们对可复制科学的兴趣——例如，在明确说明可以在哪里获得数据的文章上附上“开放数据”的标签。

A few psychology journals have created incentives to increase interest in reproducible science—for example, by affixing an 'open-data' badge to articles that clearly state where data are available.

youdao

当你点击那个特定的标签时，你会看到几个不同版本的文章。

You're going to get several different looking versions of articles when you click on that particular tab.

youdao

一些心理学杂志已经创造了激励机制来增加对可再生科学的兴趣，例如，通过在文章上贴上一个‘开放数据’的标签来明确说明数据在哪里可以获得。

A few psychology journals have created incentives to increase interest in reproducible science for example, by affixing an 'open data' badge to articles that clearly state where data are available.

youdao

Then you're going to get several different looking versions of articles when you click on that particular tab.

之后当你们点击特定的标签,会得到相应不同版本的文章

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选

So Klawans notes in the article you read that the physical substances and states that are labeled impure and are therefore designated as antithetical to the realm of holiness are states that are associated with death on the one hand, and procreation on the other. Why should this be?

克洛文对你们现在读到的文章有过这样的说明,那些被贴上不洁标签,然后被认为和神圣的领域相对立的物质和状态,一方面来说都和死亡有关系，而另一方面和生殖有关，这是怎么回事呢？

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

It's also very interesting to think about how the food label could change because this legislation comes up here and there and government consideration, and so if you guys have thoughts that you'd like to write about on one of your concept sheets about what could done to the food label to make it more effective, and more accessible to people, then feel free to write about that. Yes?

考虑一下食品标签可以如何改进,也是很有意思的,因为立法和政府考虑无处不在,如果大家有任何想法的话,可以在你们的观点报告里写一篇文章,关于如何改进食品标签,使其更有效,并且更通俗易懂,大家可以自由发挥,请讲

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选