这篇文章的基调是温和的，对争论双方的意见都予以表达。

The article was moderate in tone and presented both sides of the case.

《牛津词典》

理性的人们可能会争论是否这些文章的用语激进，但没有人可以否认它们与事实都有一定偏离。

Reasonable people may debate whether the language in these articles is inflammatory, but no one can deny that they are all in some way inaccurate.

youdao

只放我们认为能够激起争论的最好的文章和片段，让它们上线。

Only the best articles, and pieces we thought would spark debate, made it online.

youdao

So Milton explains in The Reason of Church Government -he tries to mend this breach and so he argues in this treatise that "Poetry has" -and I'm quoting him here -"Poetry has a power beside the office of the pulpit."

因此弥尔顿在中解释到,他试图修复自身的这种僭越，因此,他在文章中争论到“,我这里也引用了,“诗歌有着布道论教所不可及的力量“

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

One of the texts of de Man -also in the book called Allegories of Reading where you'll find also a version of the essay "Semiology and Rhetoric" one of the essays that those who had actually read de Man actually argued about in a persistent fashion is called "The Purloined Ribbon."

德曼的一篇文章,同样在《阅读的寓言》这本书中能找到,在这本书中还能找到“符号学与修辞“的一个版本“,这是一篇读过德曼的人都会,不停争论的文章，它叫“偷窃的缎带“

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选