对立甚至以类政治术语的形式出现了——即激进自由主义与精英保守主义之争。
The opposition has even been presented in quasi-political terms—of radical liberalism vs elitist conservatism.
但齐泽克的分析试图重新赋予政治意义,否定这种自由主义的批评。
But Zizek's analysis seeks to reinscribe political meanings in ways that negate such liberal critiques.
But we all know do we not that most contemporary political scientists tend to be liberals. Their values are liberal values.
但我们都知道,不是吗?最当代的,政治科学家倾向于是自由主义者,其价值观是自由主义的价值观。
For many today, Hobbes' conception of the Leviathan state is synonymous with anti-liberal absolutism.
对今天许多的学者而言,霍布斯在《利维坦》中的政治主张,就是反自由主义之专制主义的代名词。
This raises a question. Whether the relation between contemporary political science and liberalism is merely accidental or whether there is some intrinsic some necessary connection between them.
这导出一个问题,当代政治科学,与自由主义的关系仅是偶然,或之间,有些本质的,一些必然的,连结介于两者之间。
应用推荐