最近的心理学研究支持了这个推测。
对现象的主观推测是“尖锐“,但神经元的活动,明显不能与其归为同一类,所以这个基本的推断,没有的到支持。
The subjective and phenomenal predicate is sharp and the neural predicate firing along the fibers are obviously not synonymous thus the desired fundamental assumption of identity is not fulfilled.
这个家族已经被广为宣传成为，主要遭受到在后缀规则的语法使用上的缺陷所困扰，所以，根据推测也支持了，语法之特定基因的存在。
This family has been widely publicised as suffering primarily from a defect in the use of grammatical suffixation rules, thus supposedly supporting the existence of genes specific to grammar.
应用推荐