纽约市立大学的肯德尔·艾斯津与其同事说，事实却是如此。他们邀请了57名志愿者在不同情景下对道德的可疑性用1至100的比例打分评价。

So say Kendall Eskine at the City University of New York and colleagues, who asked 57 volunteers to rate how morally questionable a set of scenarios were on a scale of 1 to 100.

youdao

首先他们询问了居民对于生活的总体满意程度，然后将他们的答案在“生活评价”一项里从1到10打分。

First they asked subjects to reflect on their overall satisfaction with their lives, and ranked their answers using a "life evaluation" score between 1 and 10.

youdao

结果发现，打分人虽然文化背景不同，但对于相貌的评价却表现出惊人的一致性，只是法国人对美貌的界定还是一贯的挑剔。

Unclouded by politics (none of the candidates was recognised) the scorers showed a surprising amount of cross-cultural consensus—although the French were as usual notably harsh judges.

youdao