我觉得特别有必要把以上这一点强调一下,这是因为我曾经有过一次很尴尬的经历。 这次经历也非常深刻地证明了刚才我跟大家谈到的这一点。
I feel the more inclined to emphasise this caution because I once had a rather embarrassing and pointed proof of its desirability, -- which I relate for the enlightening of the reader.
我刚才已经强调了,这无非是一起商业个案。
I emphasized earlier that this is merely an individual commercial case.
我可以想象为什么克如此强调刚才引用的那点。
I can imagine why Krishnamurti so insisted on the point just quoted.
Well, again, just as I said verbally a moment ago, if you're going here, you're literally touching, trying to read or change memory that's beyond the boundaries of a chunk of memory that you're supposed to be touching based on its length.
嗯,再次强调,就像我刚才说的,如果你从这里出发,你将依次接触到,试着读取或者改变内存,如果超出了你可以使用的,内存块长度的界限。
So again the point I was just emphasizing was even if we accept the personality theory, this doesn't threaten our being physicalists.
我刚才再次强调的一点,即使我们接受了人格论,也不会和物理主义学者的身份冲突。
OK. So. Why did I do it? It's a simple example, I agree, but notice what I just did. It allowed me to highlight, is the code doing the right thing?
这是一个简单的例子,我同意,但是请注意我刚才是怎么做的,我通过它想要强调,代码是做了正确的?
应用推荐