【释义】:运用归纳推理所作的证明。论题是一般性知识,论据是在该一般性知识范围之内的知识或事实。只有完全归纳推理和科学归纳推理可以用于证明,简单枚举归纳推理不能用于证明。
即便我们的归纳证明不能依赖纯粹的推理,对于归纳法实用主义的论证尝试也会得以体现。
And the Pragmatic Justification of induction attempt have been made to show that even if we cannot justify relying on induction by pure reason.
虽然很容易一厢情愿地相信没有一个像这样的代码,但是对一些编码支持的网站研究足以证明作出如此归纳的愚蠢。
It is easy to believe wishfully that no one would ever code like this, but a casual perusal of a few coding-support websites is enough to demonstrate the folly of making such generalizations.
其中一条关于试图回答休谟理论的便是,归纳法实际上可以经由纯粹的推理证明,而不是演示,诉之于概率的除外。
One way of trying to answer Hume is to show that actually induction can be justified by pure reason but by appeal to probability rather than demonstration.
Actually we could prove inductively that it holds, but how do we know it stops?
这是一种归纳型的定义,事实上我们能够归纳性地证明它?
应用推荐