如果马克思认为或感觉到在李嘉图学派的价格分析中,竞争机制需要替代品,那么,他为什么不把竞争机制剔出呢?
If Marx had in mind or felt he needed some substitute for the competitive mechanism in the Ricardian analysis of prices, why dose he not bring it out?
如果马克思认为定价只是用来掩盖相关关系的不用重要的现象,那他为什么会对转型问题投入如此多的精力和时间呢?
If Marx considered pricing an unimportant phenomena which only served to obscure the relevant relationships, when why did he devote so much effort and space to the transformation problem?
所以,如果相信作者存在十分危险,我们该如何对待马克思,尼采和弗洛伊德呢?
So if it's dangerous to believe that there are authors, what about Marx, Nietzsche and Freud?
So if it's dangerous to believe that there are authors, what about Marx, Nietzsche and Freud?
所以,如果相信作者存在十分危险,我们该如何对待马克思,尼采和弗洛伊德呢?
It's a problem if we reject the police-like authority of authors, of whom we may have a certain suspicion on those grounds, when we certainly don't feel that way about Marx and Freud.
但若我们并不喜欢马克思和弗洛伊德,那么如果我们排斥警察,就好像因为对作者有所怀疑,而排斥作者权威的话,就有问题了。
应用推荐