每个命题的主语必须是一个资源。
命题的宾语可以是资源或者文字。
但也有基于命题的特殊论述方向,只用于特殊事项。
But there are also those special Lines of Argument which are based on such propositions as apply only to particular groups or classes of things.
So, that's the basic insight in Modigliani and Miller, that share repurchase and dividend are really interchangeable; it's just all a conceptual difference.
这即是莫迪利阿尼和米勒命题的内涵,股票回购和分红彼此是可替代的,只是概念上有所不同
Hobbes' members of a state of nature seem to be in a classic prisoner's dilemma problem.
霍布斯自然状态的命题,看起来像一个经典的囚徒困境。
I think the simplest way to understand Modigliani-Miller proposition is the following: imagine that we, as a board, decided to pay a dividend of $5 a share.
理解莫迪利阿尼和米勒命题,最简单的方式是,假设我们构成了一个董事会,决定以每股5美元的比例发放股利
应用推荐