一个人不仅是合法的,但在道义上有责任遵守公正的法律。
One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws.
他是一个真正的具有双重人格的人:在家里他温良和善,但在生意场上他却完全不讲道义。
He's a real Jekyll and Hyde: at home he's kind and loving, but in business he's completely without principles.
If it's a bad argument, then Locke's given us a mere rationalization that isn't morally defensible.
如果他的观点是错的,那么洛克的辩护,只是看似合理,但在道义上站不住脚。
But if the state has the right to take my earning or the fruits of my labor, isn't that morally the same as according to the state the right to claim a portion of my labor?
但如果政府有权,强占我的收入或劳动果实,这在道义上不就等同于,政府有权,让我做部分义务劳动吗?
应用推荐