帕特里夏说“讲课是一种非自然的行为，这种行为不是上帝设计给人类的”，我认为她的观察很有道理。

There is, I think, much truth in Patricia's observation that "lecturing is an unnatural act, an act for which God did not design humans".

youdao

今天，如果你仔细观察研究基因如何影响人类行为的专家们，你会发现许多反弗兰肯斯坦的准则。

Today, if you look at people who study how genetics shape human behavior, you find a collection of anti-Frankensteins.

youdao

我们可以观察人类的行为模式，对记忆进行复查。

We observe patterns of our own behavior and we have memories for review.

youdao

One argument involved observations of a human action.

第一点是基于对人类行为的观察

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

And Charles Darwin actually, who was an astute observer of human behavior, tells a nice story to illustrate this: how "a native touched with his finger some cold preserved meat and plainly showed disgust at its softness whilst I felt utter disgust at my food being touched by a naked savage though his hands did not appear dirty."

达尔文，对人类行为观察入微，他有一个故事很好地解释了反感：,“一个土著用手指碰冷腌肉,那种软软的质地让他感到很反感,而让我感无无比反感的是我的食物,被一个没穿衣取的土著碰了，虽然他的手不脏“

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选