I would like to correct the question, there is no philosophy.
我希望纠正一下这个问题,没有哲学,没有。
It actually is a lot easier for an implementation to take a definition that said, "This is what a correctly formed definition would look like," and then from that definition generate correct code.
实际上,对于实现而言,采用定义要简单得多,定义说明,“正确形成的定义就应该是这个样子”,然后从这个定义生成正确的代码。
A: I don't think your interpretation is correct. I would like to reiterate my previous response.
答:我认为你的理解是不正确的,我可以再重复一下刚才我的回答。
So things break if you try-- if the computer tries to take you too literally so it would not be correct generally to do something like that.
如果你把它分开-,那么电脑会逐字逐句地解析,你拆开写的代码,由此得到的结果一般都是错误的。
应用推荐