Let's go through the argument again.
让我们再来讨论一下这一论点。
The first is to present your paper in progress orally, talking through the argument from an outline which you will also give us.
其一是口头报告你正在准备的论文,并事先分派你要讲述的论点大纲给大家。
And then take you through the argument but off course if you still don't accept the premise then really you'll never accept the conclusion of my argument are you?
然后你看过论点,但是当然,如果你仍然不能接受前提,那么你永远不会接受我论点的结论,对吗?
So if we understand the argument in terms of the second interpretation, it looks as invisible. It looks all the argument still go through, Simmias' counterexample fails.
所以如果我们以第二种解释,理解这个论证,灵魂是无形的,所有的论证仍然讲得通,西米亚斯的反例无效了。
应用推荐