In an architecture or design will the use of one or the other term be sufficient without further explanation?
在一个架构或设计中使用其中一个术语而不加以更多解释就够了吗?
Do not replace a term for an explanation.
不要用解释来代替术语。
While climate change is the most probable explanation for thisphenomenon, the lack of long term climatic data for the area makes itimpossible for the researchers to officially confirm this.
虽然这一现象极可能是因气候变化,缺乏该地区的长期气候数据,使研究人员无法正式证实这一点。
In other words, Freud, Sophocles, all of the other versions I have at my disposal, have equal merit as versions, but none of them is a transcendental signified, none of them is a blanket term, and none of them is the causal explanation or meaning of the myth.
换句话说,弗洛伊德,索福克勒斯,还有所有其它供我使用的版本,都用同样的优点,但它们中没有一个是超验所指,没有一个是概括性话语,没有一个是神话的随意解释或意义。
应用推荐