But dualism doesn't so much offer the explanation typically as just say, "Well, maybe we'd be better off positing something immaterial."

但是二元论还没有给出,这样的解释,也许我们假设非物质的存在会好一些

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

The reason I think it doesn't follow trivially is because, remember, I said we're dealing with interactionist dualism.

我认为它并非自然地得出结论的原因是,记住,我们在和心物交互二元论打交道

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

As always with philosophy, there's more complicated versions of dualism where maybe the interaction doesn't work both ways, but let's just limit ourselves to good, old-fashioned, two-way interactionist dualism.

但由于我们在说的是哲学,二元论还持有更为复杂的观点,例如,交互作用对双方都不起作用,但就让我们限制在一个范围内较好,保守的,双向互动二元论观点

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选