Exactly. Exactly. And it is a strange inversion. A creationist pamphlet has this wonderful page in it: "Test Two: Do you know of any building that didn't have a builder?Yes No."

的确这个理论确实背离一般常理神造世界论者的传单上可能会问测验二有建筑不出自建筑者之手吗？

youdao

I mean, it really is a strange inversion of reasoning. You would have thought it stands to reason that design requires an intelligent designer. But Darwin shows that it's just false.

这就是我所谓违常的逆向推理你可能一向认为每个设计都需要厉害的设计师达尔文却认为这样才不合理。

youdao

Now, however, Mr Brands notices a strange inversion.

ECONOMIST: 20th-century America